Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 32 (November 10), 2005: pp. 8198-8203
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1468

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eastham, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eastham, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REVIEW ARTICLE

Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy

Andrew J. Stephenson, James A. Eastham

From the Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Address reprint requests to James A. Eastham, MD, Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: easthamj{at}mskcc.org.

Patients with isolated local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation therapy may potentially be cured of their disease by salvage radical prostatectomy (RP). The stage-specific 5-year cancer-control rates of salvage RP resemble those of standard RP. However, the ability to effectively administer salvage treatment to patients with radiorecurrent disease is compromised by the lack of diagnostic tests with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to detect local recurrence at an early stage while it is amenable to local salvage therapy. By the time biochemical recurrence is declared using the current American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition, the majority of patients have advanced local disease, precluding successful local salvage therapy. When salvage RP is performed at prostate-specific antigen levels of 10 ng/mL or less, an estimated 70% of patients are free of disease at 5 years. With better patient selection and technical modifications, the morbidity associated with salvage RP has improved substantially. Rates of urinary incontinence and anastomotic stricture are acceptable, although one third of patients will experience these complications. Salvage cryotherapy is a minimally invasive alternative to salvage RP, but cancer-control rates appear to be inferior and it does not provide a clear advantage over salvage RP in terms of reduced morbidity. Patients with local recurrence after radiation therapy are at increased risk of metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality. Currently, salvage RP represents the only curative treatment option for these patients. Salvage RP may favorably alter the natural history of biochemical recurrence after radiation therapy, but it must be instituted early in the course of recurrent disease to be effective.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Patel, R. Mick, J. Finlay, T. C. Zhu, E. Rickter, K. A. Cengel, S. B. Malkowicz, S. M. Hahn, and T. M. Busch
Motexafin Lutetium-Photodynamic Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Short- and Long-Term Effects on Prostate-Specific Antigen
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4869 - 4876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M.-E. Taplin, W. Xie, G. J. Bubley, M. S. Ernstoff, W. Walsh, D. E. Morganstern, and M. M. Regan
Docetaxel, Estramustine, and 15-Month Androgen Deprivation for Men With Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression After Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5408 - 5413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. J. Small and E. A. Klein
Challenges and Future Directions in the Prevention and Management of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8143 - 8145.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online