|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8713-8716 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4222 Recent Chemotherapy Reduces the Sensitivity of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection of Colorectal MetastasesFrom the Departments of Surgery, Nuclear Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY Address reprint requests Yuman Fong, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: fongy{at}mskcc.org PURPOSE: [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has become a useful tool in the assessment of patients with colorectal cancer. Patients often undergo chemotherapy as treatment for primary or metastatic colorectal malignancy. Because cytotoxic chemotherapy may decrease the cellular metabolic activity of tumor, we assessed the effects of chemotherapy on PET imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study examining detection of hepatic colorectal metastases by FDG-PET as related to use of chemotherapy. Pathologic analysis of the liver resection specimens was used as gold standard. RESULTS: There was significantly decreased tumor FDG uptake (as measured by the maximal standardized uptake value) in patients treated preoperatively with chemotherapy, resulting in less efficient detection of cancerous lesions. One biologic basis of this change in accuracy of PET was a significant decrease in the activity of the key glycolytic enzyme hexokinase in tumors from patients treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that FDG-PET scanning should be interpreted in the context of concurrent cytotoxic therapy. FDG-PET scanning results may also be useful in assessment of response to such cytotoxic therapies. Supported by US Public Health Service Grants No. RO1CA76416, RO1CA72632, RO1CA80982 and RO1CA61524 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant No. MBC-99366 from the American Cancer Society and the Laurent and Alberta Gerschel Foundation. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|