Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8757-8764
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9521
Bexarotene and Erlotinib for Aerodigestive Tract Cancer
Konstantin H. Dragnev,
W. Jeffrey Petty,
Sumit Shah,
Adrian Biddle,
Neil B. Desai,
Vincent Memoli,
James R. Rigas,
Ethan Dmitrovsky
From the Hematology/Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center; Departments of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Pathology, Dartmouth Medical School and Dartmouth College Hanover; and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
Address reprint requests to Ethan Dmitrovsky, MD, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Remsen 7650, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755; e-mail: ethan.dmitrovsky{at}dartmouth.edu
PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclin D1 are overexpressed in lung carcinogenesis. The rexinoid, bexarotene, represses cyclin D1 and EGFR expression in vitro. It was hypothesized that combining bexarotene with the EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, would augment clinical activity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In vitro studies and a phase I clinical trial were performed. Twenty-four patients with advanced aerodigestive tract cancers were enrolled; 79% had nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose. Clinical activity was a secondary objective.
RESULTS: Combining erlotinib with bexarotene enhanced growth suppression in vitro compared with each single-agent treatment. This cooperatively repressed cyclin D1 expression. Clinically, the most frequent toxicities were mild hypertriglyceridemia and skin rash. Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred (creatine phosphokinase elevation attributed to antilipid therapy and a case of generalized pain). Five objective responses (four partial and one minor) were observed in NSCLC patients. Responses were observed in males and smokers. EGFR sequence analyses did not reveal activating mutations in tumors from assessable responding patients. Median time to progression was 2.0 months; overall survival time was 14.1 months; and 1-year survival rate was 73.8%.
CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses are erlotinib 150 mg/d and bexarotene 400 mg/m2/d orally. These agents can be administered in combination at the recommended single-agent doses without added toxicity. Overall survival and clinical features of responding patients differ from prior reports of single-agent erlotinib treatment. These findings are encouraging and warrant further investigation of this regimen.
Presented in part at the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, June 5-8, 2004; and the 16th European Organisation for Research and Treatment of CancerNational Cancer InstituteAmerican Association for Cancer Research Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, Geneva, Switzerland, September 28-October 1, 2004.
Supported by Community Clinical Oncology Program Grant No. CA37447-21 (K.H.D.), the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute Grant Nos. RO1-CA087546 (E.D.), R01-CA111422 (E.D.), and RO1-CA62275 (E.D.); a Samuel Waxman Foundation Cancer Research Award (E.D.); and the Oracle Giving Fund (E.D.). W.J.P. received grant support from the CHEST Foundation of the American College of Chest Physicians and the LUNGevity Foundation, the National Research Service Award No. T32-CA009658 from the National Institutes of Health, and an American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Young Investigator Award. K.H.D. was also supported by an ASCO Young Investigator Award. Additional funding was provided by Ligand and Genentech (K.H.D.).
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Freemantle, Y. Guo, and E. Dmitrovsky
Retinoid Chemoprevention Trials: Cyclin D1 in the Crosshairs
Cancer Prevention Research,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
3 - 6.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Feng, D. Sekula, Y. Guo, X. Liu, C. C. Black, F. Galimberti, S. J. Shah, L. F. Sempere, V. Memoli, J. B. Andersen, et al.
UBE1L causes lung cancer growth suppression by targeting cyclin D1
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
December 1, 2008;
7(12):
3780 - 3788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. N. Fleming, M. Hogben, S. Frame, S. J. McClue, and S. R. Green
Synergistic Inhibition of ErbB Signaling by Combined Treatment with Seliciclib and ErbB-Targeting Agents
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2008;
14(13):
4326 - 4335.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Liby, C. C. Black, D. B. Royce, C. R. Williams, R. Risingsong, M. M. Yore, X. Liu, T. Honda, G. W. Gribble, W. W. Lamph, et al.
The rexinoid LG100268 and the synthetic triterpenoid CDDO-methyl amide are more potent than erlotinib for prevention of mouse lung carcinogenesis
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
May 1, 2008;
7(5):
1251 - 1257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. H. Dragnev, W. J. Petty, S. J. Shah, L. D. Lewis, C. C. Black, V. Memoli, W. C. Nugent, T. Hermann, A. Negro-Vilar, J. R. Rigas, et al.
A Proof-of-Principle Clinical Trial of Bexarotene in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2007;
13(6):
1794 - 1800.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Germain, P. Chambon, G. Eichele, R. M. Evans, M. A. Lazar, M. Leid, A. R. De Lera, R. Lotan, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and H. Gronemeyer
International Union of Pharmacology. LXIII. Retinoid X Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2006;
58(4):
760 - 772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Govindan, J. Crowley, L. Schwartzberg, P. Kennedy, C. Williams, B. Ekstrand, A. Sandler, D. Jaunakais, V. Bolejack, and R. Ghalie
Phase II Trial of Bexarotene Capsules in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Two or More Previous Therapies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2006;
24(30):
4848 - 4854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Freemantle, K. H. Dragnev, and E. Dmitrovsky
The retinoic Acid paradox in cancer chemoprevention.
J Natl Cancer Inst,
April 5, 2006;
98(7):
426 - 427.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dmitrovsky
D-Type Cyclins as Novel Targets for Chemoprevention
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book,
April 1, 2006;
2006(1):
59 - 63.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|