Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1997 on October 24 2005
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8786-8793
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Multicenter Phase I/II Study of Cetuximab With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Untreated Patients With Stage IV NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
Christiane D. Thienelt,
Paul A. Bunn, Jr,
Nasser Hanna,
Arthur Rosenberg,
Michael N. Needle,
Michael E. Long,
Daniel L. Gustafson,
Karen Kelly
From the Division of Medical Oncology and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Bendheim Cancer Center, Greenwich, CT; and ImClone Systems Incorporated, Branchburg, NJ.
Address reprint requests to Karen Kelly, MD, Health Sciences Center, University of Colorado at Denver, 12801 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80010; e-mail: karen.kelly{at}uchsc.edu
PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the safety profile of the monoclonal antibody EGFR inhibitor, cetuximab, when added to paclitaxel and carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV NSCLC. Secondary objectives included efficacy and paclitaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics during cetuximab treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with tumor evidence of EGFR by immunohistochemistry, performance status of 0 to 2, and measurable disease received paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 with carboplatin area under the curve = 6 on day 1 every 3 weeks. Cetuximab was administered at 400 mg/m2, 1 week before paclitaxel and carboplatin, then weekly at 250 mg/m2. The regimen continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
RESULTS: Thirty-one of 32 enrolled patients were treated. The most common cetuximab toxicity was rash in 84% of patients (grade 3 in 13%). Pharmacokinetic sampling did not reveal an interaction between carboplatin, paclitaxel, and cetuximab. An objective response was observed in eight patients (26%). With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median time to progression was 5 months, median survival was 11 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 40% and 16%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combination of cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin was safe and well tolerated in this population of stage IV patients. The response rate, time to progression, and median survival were slightly superior to historical controls treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone. A randomized phase II trial has completed accrual.
Supported by a grant from ImClone Systems Incorporated.
Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 31-June 3, 2003, Chicago, IL.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Hirsch, R. S. Herbst, C. Olsen, K. Chansky, J. Crowley, K. Kelly, W. A. Franklin, P. A. Bunn Jr, M. Varella-Garcia, and D. R. Gandara
Increased EGFR Gene Copy Number Detected by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Predicts Outcome in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab and Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2008;
26(20):
3351 - 3357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Hodkinson, A. MacKinnon, and T. Sethi
Targeting Growth Factors in Lung Cancer
Chest,
May 1, 2008;
133(5):
1209 - 1216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rosell, G. Robinet, A. Szczesna, R. Ramlau, M. Constenla, B. C. Mennecier, W. Pfeifer, K. J. O'Byrne, T. Welte, R. Kolb, et al.
Randomized phase II study of cetuximab plus cisplatin/vinorelbine compared with cisplatin/vinorelbine alone as first-line therapy in EGFR-expressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2008;
19(2):
362 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Butts, D. Bodkin, E. L. Middleman, C. W. Englund, D. Ellison, Y. Alam, H. Kreisman, P. Graze, J. Maher, H. J. Ross, et al.
Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2007;
25(36):
5777 - 5784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Seitz and H. Zhou
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Potentials for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Reality Check
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2007;
47(9):
1104 - 1118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Morgensztern and R. Govindan
Is There a Role for Cetuximab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer?
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2007;
13(15):
4602s - 4605s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Steiner, C. Joynes, R. Bassi, S. Wang, J. R. Tonra, Y. R. Hadari, and D. J. Hicklin
Tumor Growth Inhibition with Cetuximab and Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenografts Expressing Wild-type and Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2007;
13(5):
1540 - 1551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kurai, H. Chikumi, K. Hashimoto, K. Yamaguchi, A. Yamasaki, T. Sako, H. Touge, H. Makino, M. Takata, M. Miyata, et al.
Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Mediated by Cetuximab against Lung Cancer Cell Lines
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2007;
13(5):
1552 - 1561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hanna, R. Lilenbaum, R. Ansari, T. Lynch, R. Govindan, P. A. Janne, and P. Bonomi
Phase II Trial of Cetuximab in Patients With Previously Treated Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2006;
24(33):
5253 - 5258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Stinchcombe, D. Fried, D. E. Morris, and M. A. Socinski
Combined Modality Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist,
July 1, 2006;
11(7):
809 - 823.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Ettinger
Clinical Implications of EGFR Expression in the Development and Progression of Solid Tumors: Focus on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Oncologist,
April 1, 2006;
11(4):
358 - 373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A Frieze and J. S McCune
Current Status of Cetuximab for the Treatment of Patients with Solid Tumors
Ann. Pharmacother.,
February 1, 2006;
40(2):
241 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|