|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8819-8827 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.2931 Outcomes of Children With Intermediate-Risk Neuroblastoma After Treatment Stratified by MYCN Status and Tumor Cell PloidyFrom the University of Arizona, Department of Pediatrics and Steele Childrens Research Center, Tucson, AZ; Childrens Oncology Group, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE; Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta; Emory University, Atlanta, GA Address reprint requests to Rochelle Bagatell, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Room 5341, Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724; e-mail: bagatell{at}peds.arizona.edu; CC: pubs{at}childrensoncologygroup.org PURPOSE: The goal of Pediatric Oncology Group 9243 was to improve outcomes for children with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma (NB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned to treatments on the basis of age, tumor MYCN status, and tumor cell ploidy. Children in the less intensive arm A received cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin and surgery. Patients not in complete remission postoperatively were treated with cisplatin/etoposide, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin, and additional surgery. Patients with less favorable features were assigned to arm B, which consisted of carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, and surgery. Survival rates were determined using an intent-to-treat approach. RESULTS: For arm-A patients, the 6-year event-free survival (EFS) was 86% with an SE of 3%. For arm-B patients, the 6-year EFS was 46% with an SE of 7%. MYCN status was the only statistically significant prognostic variable. Among patients whose tumors were MYCN nonamplified, a trend toward improved EFS was seen in children with hyperdiploid versus diploid tumors. However, many of these children responded well to salvage therapy, and overall survival rates did not differ on the basis of ploidy. Six-year EFS rates for arm B were patients with MYCN nonamplified, hyperdiploid tumors, 86% with an SE of 3%; patients with MYCN nonamplified, diploid tumors, 74% with an SE of 10%; patients with MYCN-amplified, hyperdiploid tumors, 46% with an SE of 15%; and patients with MYCN-amplified, diploid tumors, 22% with an SE of 10%. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for patients with MYCN-nonamplified, hyperdiploid tumors were excellent. Therapy reductions for these patients merit study. A trend toward less favorable outcomes for patients with MYCN-nonamplified, diploid tumors was observed; more children may need to be evaluated before therapy is reduced for this subgroup. For patients with MYCN-amplified tumors, new strategies are needed. Supported in part by the Pediatric Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center Grants No. U10 CA29139 and Childrens Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center Grant No. U10 CA98413-01, the Caitlin Robb Foundation (R.B.), NIH Grant No. CA39771 (G.M.B.), and National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA98543 (A.T.L.) and CA104605 (A.T.L.). Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|