Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8894-8905
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.4605

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKoy, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKoy, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REVIEW ARTICLE

Caveat Medicus: Consequences of Federal Investigations of Marketing Activities of Pharmaceutical Suppliers of Prostate Cancer Drugs

June M. McKoy, E. Allison Lyons, Eniola Obadina, Kenneth Carson, A. Simon Pickard, Paul Schellhammer, David McLeod, Cynthia E. Boyd, Norene McWilliams, Oliver Sartor, Glen T. Schumock, Kathryn McCaffery, Charles L. Bennett

From the Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center Lakeside Community-Based Outpatient Clinic and the Mid-West Center for Health Services and Policy Research; the Divisions of Hematology/Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Institute for Health Service Research and Policy of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Rush Medical College; Center for Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL; Department of Urology, Stanley Scott Cancer Center of the Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA; Urologic Oncology Clinic, Urology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; and The Virginia Prostate Center of Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.

Address reprint requests to Charles L. Bennett, MD, PhD, MPP, Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of General Internal Medicine/ Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 333 E Huron St, Ste 277, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: cbenne{at}northwestern.edu

In the course of recent health care fraud investigations against TAP Pharmaceuticals (Lake Forest, IL) and AstraZeneca International (London, United Kingdom), each pled guilty to one violation of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, settled claims related to alleged violations of the False Claims Act without admitting guilt, and paid fines, settlements for liabilities, and reimbursements of $850 million and $355 million, respectively. In a unique aspect of these cases, federal investigators brought criminal charges against 14 TAP employees and investigated the billing practices of several urologists. These investigations resulted in guilty pleas from both urologists and industry employees relative to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act or the False Claims Act and probationary sentences with payments of fines and restitution to the government for urologists who cooperated with federal investigations. One uncooperative urologist was found guilty of violating the Federal False Claims Act and sentenced to 6 months of home arrest, excluded from Medicare for 5 years, required to provide 600 hours of free medical care to indigent patients and patients covered by Medicare or Medicaid, and paid fines and restitution to the government. The cases against TAP and AstraZeneca have been followed by federal and state investigations of allegedly illegal marketing practices of other pharmaceutical firms and have resulted in negotiated settlements of $3.8 billion and $71.5 million, respectively. Believing that an Average Wholesale Price–based reimbursement system was an important driving factor for these marketing activities, Medicare has shifted to an Average Sales Price–based reimbursement system. This is expected to greatly impact the practice of outpatient oncology nationwide.

Supported in part by Grants No. 1R01CA 102713-01 and P 30 CA60553 from the National Cancer Institute (C.L.B. and J.M.M.).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. S. Kesselheim and D. M. Studdert
Whistleblower-Initiated Enforcement Actions against Health Care Fraud and Abuse in the United States, 1996 to 2005
Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2008; 149(5): 342 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online