Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 6 (February 20), 2005: pp. 1136-1143
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.129
[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Outcome of NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
Ryohei Sasaki,
Ritsuko Komaki,
Homer Macapinlac,
Jeremy Erasmus,
Pamela Allen,
Kenneth Forster,
Joe B. Putnam,
Roy S. Herbst,
Cesar A. Moran,
Donald A. Podoloff,
Jack A. Roth,
James D. Cox
From the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Division of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Address reprint requests to Ritsuko Komaki, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: rkomaki{at}mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: To determine whether the standardized uptake value (SUV) of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography could be a prognostic factor for nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-two patients with stage I to IIIb NSCLC were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local-regional control (LRC) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with the log-rank test. The prognostic significance was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: There were 93 patients treated with surgery and 69 patients treated with radiotherapy. A cutoff of 5 for the SUV for the primary tumor showed the best discriminative value. The SUV for the primary tumor was a significant predictor of OS (P = .02) in both groups. Low SUVs ( 5.0) showed significantly better DFS rates than those with high SUVs (> 5.0; surgery group, P = .02; radiotherapy group, P = .0005). Low SUVs ( 5.0) indicated a significantly better DFS than those with high SUVs (> 5.0; stage I or II, P = .02; stage IIIa or IIIb, P = .004). However, using the same cutoff point of 5, the SUV for regional lymph nodes was not a significant indicator for DFS (P = .19), LRC (P = .97), or DMFS (P = .17). The multivariate analysis showed that the SUV for the primary tumor was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P = .03) and DFS (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: The SUV of the primary tumor was the strongest prognostic factor among the patients treated by curative surgery or radiotherapy.
R.S. is supported by a research fellowship grant from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Kobe City, Japan.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kaira, N. Oriuchi, K. Shimizu, H. Tominaga, N. Yanagitani, N. Sunaga, T. Ishizuka, Y. Kanai, M. Mori, and K. Endo
18F-FMT Uptake Seen Within Primary Cancer on PET Helps Predict Outcome of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
J. Nucl. Med.,
November 1, 2009;
50(11):
1770 - 1776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Chung, H.-S. Jeong, S. G. Park, J. Y. Jang, Y.-I. Son, J. Y. Choi, S. H. Hyun, K. Park, M.-J. Ahn, Y. C. Ahn, et al.
Metabolic Tumor Volume of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Predicts Short-Term Outcome to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Pharyngeal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2009;
15(18):
5861 - 5868.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Wahl, H. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, and M. A. Lodge
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2009;
50(Suppl_1):
122S - 150S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Sculier
Prognostic Factors and Implications of Positron Emission Tomography
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
469 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Winnard Jr., A. P. Pathak, S. Dhara, S. Y. Cho, V. Raman, and M. G. Pomper
Molecular Imaging of Metastatic Potential
J. Nucl. Med.,
June 1, 2008;
49(Suppl_2):
96S - 112S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Hoang, L. F. Hoagland, R. E. Coleman, A. D. Coan, J. E. Herndon II, and E. F. Patz Jr
Prognostic Value of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Advanced-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2008;
26(9):
1459 - 1464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Lopez-Rios, M. Sanchez-Arago, E. Garcia-Garcia, A. D. Ortega, J. R. Berrendero, F. Pozo-Rodriguez, A. Lopez-Encuentra, C. Ballestin, and J. M. Cuezva
Loss of the Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Capacity Underlies the Glucose Avidity of Carcinomas
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2007;
67(19):
9013 - 9017.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Downey, T. Akhurst, M. Gonen, B. Park, and V. Rusch
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival independent of clinical but not pathologic TNM staging of resected non-small cell lung cancer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
June 1, 2007;
133(6):
1419 - 1427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Weber, J. Czernin, and M. E. Phelps
Prognostic Significance of Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Blurry Picture?
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2007;
13(11):
3105 - 3106.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Vesselle, J. D. Freeman, L. Wiens, J. Stern, H. Q. Nguyen, S. E. Hawes, P. Bastian, A. Salskov, E. Vallieres, and D. E. Wood
Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake of Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at Positron Emission Tomography: New Contrary Data on Prognostic Role
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2007;
13(11):
3255 - 3263.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Riedl, T. Akhurst, S. Larson, S. F. Stanziale, S. Tuorto, A. Bhargava, H. Hricak, D. Klimstra, and Y. Fong
18F-FDG PET Scanning Correlates with Tissue Markers of Poor Prognosis and Predicts Mortality for Patients After Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2007;
48(5):
771 - 775.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chong, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, J. Y. Choi, C. A Yi, M. J. Chung, D.-K. Oh, and J.-Y. Lee
Integrated PET/CT of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
May 1, 2007;
188(5):
1223 - 1231.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. de Geus-Oei, B Wiering, P. Krabbe, T. Ruers, C. Punt, and W. Oyen
FDG-PET for prediction of survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2006;
17(11):
1650 - 1655.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Demizu, R. Sasaki, T. Soejima, T. Maruta, Y. Okamoto, K. Yamada, E. Yoden, Y. Ejima, Y. Ota, H. Ishida, et al.
Efficacy and Feasibility of Cisplatin-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2006;
36(10):
620 - 625.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A.D. Smith, R. I. Sharma, A. M. Thompson, and F. E.M. Paulin
Tumor 18F-FDG Incorporation Is Enhanced by Attenuation of P53 Function in Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro
J. Nucl. Med.,
September 1, 2006;
47(9):
1525 - 1530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Prevost, L. Boucher, P. Larivee, R. Boileau, and F. Benard
Bone Marrow Hypermetabolism on 18F-FDG PET as a Survival Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2006;
47(4):
559 - 565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Chen and F. Dehdashti
Advances in Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Lung Cancer
Proceedings of the ATS,
December 1, 2005;
2(6):
541 - 544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Atkins
Overestimation of the Prognostic Significance of SUV Measurement by Positron Emission Tomography for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2005;
23(27):
6799 - 6800.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Komaki, R. Sasaki, and P. K. Allen
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2005;
23(27):
6800 - 6800.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|