Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7617 on December 5 2005

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 1 (January 1), 2006: pp. 36-44
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randall, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benda, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randall, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benda, J. A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Phase III Trial of Whole-Abdominal Irradiation Versus Doxorubicin and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Marcus E. Randall, Virginia L. Filiaci, Hyman Muss, Nick M. Spirtos, Robert S. Mannel, Jeffrey Fowler, J. Tate Thigpen, Jo Ann Benda

From Leo W. Jenkins Cancer Center, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Department of Medicine, University of Vermont-Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT; Women's Cancer Center at Community Hospital, Los Gatos, CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; and Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals, IA City, IA

Address reprint requests to Denise Mackey, Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office, Four Penn Center, 1600 JFK Blvd, Ste 1020, Philadelphia, PA 19103; e-mail: dmackey{at}gog.org

PURPOSE: To compare whole-abdominal irradiation (WAI) and doxorubicin-cisplatin (AP) chemotherapy in women with stage III or IV endometrial carcinoma having a maximum of 2 cm of postoperative residual disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-two patients were entered onto this trial. Of 396 assessable patients, 202 were randomly allocated to receive WAI, and 194 were allocated to receive AP. Irradiation dosage was 30 Gy in 20 fractions, with a 15-Gy boost. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for seven cycles, followed by one cycle of cisplatin.

RESULTS: Most patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced. The median patient age was 63 years; 50% had endometrioid tumors. Median follow-up time was 74 months. The hazard ratio for progression adjusted for stage was 0.71 favoring AP (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.91; P < .01). At 60 months, 50% of patients receiving AP were predicted to be alive and disease free when adjusting for stage compared with 38% of patients receiving WAI. The stage-adjusted death hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89; P < .01) favoring AP. Moreover, at 60 months and adjusting for stage, 55% of AP patients were predicted to be alive compared with 42% of WAI patients. Greater acute toxicity was seen with AP. Treatment probably contributed to the deaths of eight patients (4%) on the AP arm and five patients (2%) on the WAI arm.

CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with AP significantly improved progression-free and overall survival compared with WAI. Nevertheless, further advances in efficacy and reduction in toxicity are clearly needed.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA 27469 to the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Administrative Office and CA 37517 to the GOG Statistical and Data Center.

Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, May 31-June 3, 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Major Progress for a Less Common Cancer
    Gini F. Fleming
    JCO 2006 24: 6-8 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
D. S. Dizon, J. A. Blessing, D. S. McMeekin, S. K. Sharma, P. DiSilvestro, and R. D. Alvarez
Phase II Trial of Ixabepilone As Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial 129-P
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): 3104 - 3108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
A. GADDUCCI, A. CAVAZZANA, S. COSIO, C. DI CRISTOFANO, R. TANA, A. FANUCCHI, G. TETI, R. CRISTOFANI, and A. R. GENAZZANI
Lymph-vascular Space Involvement and Outer One-third Myometrial Invasion Are Strong Predictors of Distant Haematogeneous Failures in Patients with Stage I-II Endometrioid-type Endometrial Cancer
Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1715 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. M. Baekelandt, M. Castiglione, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Endometrial carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv29 - iv31.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. N. Bakkum-Gamez, J. Gonzalez-Bosquet, N. N. Laack, A. Mariani, and S. C. Dowdy
Current Issues in the Management of Endometrial Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2008; 83(1): 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
G. Fleming
Adjuvant Therapy for High-risk Adenocarcinoma of the Uterus
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 230 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Cannistra and W. P. McGuire
Progress in the Management of Gynecologic Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2865 - 2866.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. F. Fleming
Systemic Chemotherapy for Uterine Carcinoma: Metastatic and Adjuvant
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2983 - 2990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Humber, J. Tierney, R. Symonds, M Collingwood, J Kirwan, C Williams, and J. Green
Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a systematic review of Cochrane collaboration
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 409 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. E. Randall and V. L. Filiaci
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3710 - 3710.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Ozyar and M. Genc
Relapse Pattern of GOG 122 Trial Should Be More Informative
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3709 - 3710.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. F. Fleming
Major Progress for a Less Common Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online