Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 1 (January 1), 2006: pp. 45-51
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2757

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhauer, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhauer, E.

Comparison of CA-125 and Standard Definitions of Progression of Ovarian Cancer in the Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Cyclophosphamide

Gordon J.S. Rustin, Petra Timmers, Ann Nelstrop, Gavin Shreeves, Soeren M. Bentzen, Benoit Baron, Martine J. Piccart, Kamma Bertelsen, Gavin Stuart, James Cassidy, Elizabeth Eisenhauer

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex; Gray Cancer Institute, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood; Scottish Group Data Centre, Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary Glasgow, United Kingdom; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) –Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group, EORTC Data Centre, Brussels, Belgium; Nordic Gynecological Cancer Study Group Centre, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; and National Cancer Institute of Canada, Clinical Trials Group Data Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Address reprint requests to Gordon J.S. Rustin, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, HA62RN, United Kingdom. e-mail: grustin{at}nhs.net

PURPOSE: A definition for progression of ovarian cancer has been proposed based on either a confirmed doubling of CA-125 levels from the upper limit of normal or from the nadir level if levels are persistently elevated. Retrospectively, we determined whether the use of this CA-125 definition in a randomized trial would have shown the same magnitude of difference between the treatment arms as was shown when the standard progression definition was used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 680 patients in the Taxol Intergroup Trial with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma, of whom 628 were assessable according to CA-125. The date of progression according to clinical or radiologic criteria was compared with the date of progression according to CA-125.

RESULTS: Of the 628 patients assessable for both definitions, 556 clinical or radiologic progressions were determined compared with 389 according to the CA-125 definition. There was a highly significant difference in the hazard of progression between the paclitaxel and cisplatin arm (TP) compared with the cyclophosphamide and cisplatin arm (CP) when either standard or CA-125 criteria were used to define progression (standard, P = .002; CA-125, P = .011). The hazard ratio of TP/CP over time was similar when comparing the different methods of defining progression.

CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis show that the magnitude of the therapeutic benefit was similar whether CA-125 or standard criteria were used to define progression.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
D. S. Hsu, B. S. Balakumaran, C. R. Acharya, V. Vlahovic, K. S. Walters, K. Garman, C. Anders, R. F. Riedel, J. Lancaster, D. Harpole, et al.
Pharmacogenomic Strategies Provide a Rational Approach to the Treatment of Cisplatin-Resistant Patients With Advanced Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 25(28): 4350 - 4357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. K. Tummala and W. P. McGuire
Ovarian Cancer, CA-125 Addiction, and Informed Confusion: Much Ado About Less
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3570 - 3571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. Baratti, S. Kusamura, A. Martinetti, E. Seregni, D. G. Oliva, B. Laterza, and M. Deraco
Circulating CA125 in Patients with Peritoneal Mesothelioma Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 500 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online