|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 10 (April 1), 2006: pp. 1590-1596 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.7952 Phase III Intergroup Study of Fludarabine Phosphate Compared With Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Stage III and IV Low-Grade Malignant Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
From the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lymphoma Group, the British National Lymphoma Investigation Group, and the Dutch-Belgian Working Party on Hemato-Oncology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institut Bergonie Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; Ospedale Civile di Padova, Padova; S Giovanni Battista Hospital, Torino, Italy; Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood; St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leuven Medical Center, Leuven; EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium; and Schering AG, Berlin, Germany. Address reprint requests to Anton Hagenbeek, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Center, Department of Hematology (F4-224), PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: a.hagenbeek{at}amc.uva.nl PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of fludarabine phosphate with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) in 381 previously untreated, advanced-stage, low-grade (lg) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients in a phase III, multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1997, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either fludarabine (25 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] daily for 5 days every 4 weeks) or CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV on day 1; vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1; and prednisone, 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1 through 5 every 4 weeks). RESULTS: Overall response (OR) rates were significantly improved in the fludarabine arm versus the CVP arm, both for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and assessable patients (P < .001). Complete response (CR) rates in the ITT population were also higher after fludarabine treatment. The CR rate was 38.6% for fludarabine compared with 15.0% for CVP. There were no statistically significant differences in time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) between treatment groups. WHO grades 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events were more common in the fludarabine arm. However, concerning the higher incidence of granulocytopenia, this did not translate to more infections in fludarabine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Newly diagnosed lgNHL patients who received fludarabine achieved higher OR and CR rates compared with CVP-treated patients. No differences in TTP, TTF, and OS were noted. Fludarabine is a highly active single agent in lgNHL. Combination therapies incorporating fludarabine are now being further evaluated as first-line therapy in follicular NHL. Supported by Schering AG, Berlin, Germany. Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, FL, December 7-11, 2001. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|