Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 13 (May 1), 2006: pp. 2028-2037
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3273
Prognosis After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence and Locoregional Recurrences in Five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Node-Positive Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials
Irene L. Wapnir,
Stewart J. Anderson,
Eleftherios P. Mamounas,
Charles E. Geyer, Jr,
Jong-Hyeon Jeong,
Elizabeth Tan-Chiu,
Bernard Fisher,
Norman Wolmark
From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Office and Biostatistical Center; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health; Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Aultman Cancer Center and Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Canton, OH; and Cancer Research Network, Plantation, FL.
Address reprint requests to Irene L. Wapnir, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr H-3625, Stanford, CA 94305-5655; e-mail: wapnir{at}stanford.edu
PURPOSE: Locoregional failure after breast-conserving surgery is associated with increased risk of distant disease and death. The magnitude of this risk in patients receiving chemotherapy has not been adequately characterized.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study population included 2,669 women randomly assigned onto five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive protocols (B-15, B-16, B-18, B-22, and B-25), who were treated with lumpectomy, whole-breast irradiation, and adjuvant systemic therapy. Cumulative incidences of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and other locoregional recurrence (oLRR) were calculated. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate distantdisease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) after IBTR or oLRR. Cox models were used to model survival using clinical and pathologic factors jointly with IBTR or oLRR as time-varying predictors.
RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-four patients (15.9%) experienced locoregional failure; 259 (9.7%) experienced IBTR, and 165 (6.2%) experienced oLRR. The 10-year cumulative incidence of IBTR and oLRR was 8.7% and 6.0%, respectively. Most locoregional failures occurred within 5 years (62.2% for IBTR and 80.6% for oLRR). Age, tumor size, and estrogen receptor status were significantly associated with IBTR. Nodal status and estrogen and progesterone receptor status were significantly associated with oLRR. The 5-year DDFS rates after IBTR and oLRR were 51.4% and 18.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates after IBTR and oLRR were 59.9% and 24.1%, respectively. Hazard ratios for mortality associated with IBTR and oLRR were 2.58 (95% CI, 2.11 to 3.15) and 5.85 (95% CI, 4.80 to 7.13), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Node-positive breast cancer patients who developed IBTR or oLRR had significantly poorer prognoses than patients who did not experience these events.
Supported by Public Health Service Grant Nos. U10-CA-12027, CA-69651, CA-37377, and CA-69974 from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.
Presented in part at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, May 20-23, 2000.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Botteri, V. Bagnardi, N. Rotmensz, O. Gentilini, D. Disalvatore, B. Bazolli, A. Luini, and U. Veronesi
Analysis of local and regional recurrences in breast cancer after conservative surgery
Ann. Onc.,
October 15, 2009;
(2009)
mdp386v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K.A. Millar, P. H. Graham, S. A. O'Toole, C. M. McNeil, L. Browne, A. L. Morey, S. Eggleton, J. Beretov, C. Theocharous, A. Capp, et al.
Prediction of Local Recurrence, Distant Metastases, and Death After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Using a Five-Biomarker Panel
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2009;
27(28):
4701 - 4708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow and J. R. Harris
More Mastectomies: Is This What Patients Really Want?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2009;
27(25):
4038 - 4040.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Botteri, N. Rotmensz, C. Sangalli, A. Toesca, N. Peradze, H. R. De Oliveira Filho, A. Sagona, M. Intra, P. Veronesi, V. Galimberti, et al.
Unavoidable mastectomy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after conservative surgery: patient outcome
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2009;
20(6):
1008 - 1012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Anderson, I. Wapnir, J. J. Dignam, B. Fisher, E. P. Mamounas, J.-H. Jeong, C. E. Geyer Jr, D. L. Wickerham, J. P. Costantino, and N. Wolmark
Prognosis After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence and Locoregional Recurrences in Patients Treated by Breast-Conserving Therapy in Five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols of Node-Negative Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2009;
27(15):
2466 - 2473.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rabinovitch and B. Kavanagh
Double Helix of Breast Cancer Therapy: Intertwining the Halsted and Fisher Hypotheses
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2009;
27(15):
2422 - 2423.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow
Minimally invasive surgery for breast cancer
BMJ,
February 19, 2009;
338(feb19_2):
b557 - b557.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Nguyen, A. G. Taghian, M. S. Katz, A. Niemierko, R. F. Abi Raad, W. L. Boon, J. R. Bellon, J. S. Wong, B. L. Smith, and J. R. Harris
Breast Cancer Subtype Approximated by Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER-2 Is Associated With Local and Distant Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2008;
26(14):
2373 - 2378.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Kahn
Moving Research From Bench to Bedside to Community: There Is Still More to Do
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2008;
26(4):
523 - 526.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Breast Cancer Patient: Curb Your Enthusiasm
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2008;
26(3):
352 - 353.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Lash, M. P. Fox, D. S.M. Buist, F. Wei, T. S. Field, F. J. Frost, A. M. Geiger, V. P. Quinn, M. U. Yood, and R. A. Silliman
Mammography Surveillance and Mortality in Older Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2007;
25(21):
3001 - 3006.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mandelblatt
To Screen or Not to Screen Older Women for Breast Cancer: A New Twist on an Old Question or Will We Ever Invest in Getting the Answers?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2007;
25(21):
2991 - 2992.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R Kell and J. P Burke
Management of breast cancer in women with BRCA gene mutation
BMJ,
March 3, 2007;
334(7591):
437 - 438.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O Gentilini, E Botteri, N Rotmensz, B Santillo, N Peradze, R. Saihum, M Intra, A Luini, V Galimberti, A Goldhirsch, et al.
When can a second conservative approach be considered for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence?
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2007;
18(3):
468 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|