Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 13 (May 1), 2006: pp. 2092-2097
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9148

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Berk, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Berk, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Trial of an Emulsion Containing Trolamine for the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 99-13

Elizabeth A. Elliott, James R. Wright, R. Suzanne Swann, Felix Nguyen-Tân, Cristiane Takita, M. Kara Bucci, Adam S. Garden, Harold Kim, Eugen B. Hug, Janice Ryu, Michael Greenberg, Jerrold P. Saxton, Kian Ang, Lawrence Berk

From the Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Notre Dame Hospital, Montréal, Quebéc, Canada; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia; Dale and Frances Hughes Cancer Center, Pocono Medical Center, East Stroudsburg, PA; University of Miami, Miami, FL; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, CA; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Wayne State University, Gershenson Radiation Oncology Center, Detroit, MI; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland; and Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program, Columbus, OH

Address reprint requests to Elizabeth A. Elliott, MRT (T), Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, L8V5C2, Ontario, Canada; e-mail: liz.elliott{at}hrcc.on.ca

PURPOSE: This multicentered phase III trial was designed to compare an emulsion containing trolamine against the usual supportive care within each participating institution for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: prophylactic trolamine emulsion, interventional trolamine emulsion, or declared institutional preference. The primary outcome was the reduction in grade 2 or higher skin toxicity, as per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS: From October 2000 to April 2002, 547 patients from 51 institutions were entered onto the trial. The average age was 59 years. Patients were predominately male (79%) and most continued to use tobacco products (52%). The rates of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis were 79%, 77%, and 79% in the prophylactic, interventional, and institutional preference arms of the study, respectively. No significant differences in QOL were found.

CONCLUSION: The results of this trial demonstrate no advantage for the use of trolamine in reducing the incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis or improving patient-reported QOL. The use of 15 different local standards of care highlights the need to continue research that will result in evidence-based recommendations to reduce the burden of radiation dermatitis.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Compr Canc NetwHome page
B. Burtness, M. Anadkat, S. Basti, M. Hughes, M. E. Lacouture, J. S. McClure, P. L. Myskowski, J. Paul, C. S. Perlis, L. Saltz, et al.
NCCN Task Force Report: Management of Dermatologic and Other Toxicities Associated With EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Cancer
J Natl Compr Canc Netw, May 1, 2009; 7(Suppl_1): S-5 - S-21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Bernier, J Bonner, J. B. Vermorken, R.-J. Bensadoun, R. Dummer, J. Giralt, G. Kornek, A. Hartley, R. Mesia, C. Robert, et al.
Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 142 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
L. Minasian and A. O'Mara
Introduction
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2007; 2007(37): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online