Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 15 (May 20), 2006: pp. 2290-2297
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8570
Randomized Comparison of Every-2-Week Darbepoetin Alfa and Weekly Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: The 20030125 Study Group Trial
John Glaspy,
Saroj Vadhan-Raj,
Ravi Patel,
Linda Bosserman,
Eddie Hu,
Richard E. Lloyd,
Ralph V. Boccia,
Dianne Tomita,
Greg Rossi
From the University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga; University of California Los Angeles Community Oncology Research Network, Monterey Park; Fullerton Internal Medicine Clinic, Fullerton; Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Bethesda, MD
Address reprint requests to John Glaspy, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Box 956996, Suite 550, 100 Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e-mail: jglaspy{at}mednet.ucla.edu
Purpose Chemotherapy-induced anemia is widely treated in the United States with darbepoetin alfa (DA) or epoetin alfa (EA). This noninferiority study systematically compares efficacy and safety of DA and EA using common doses and schedules used in clinical practice.
Methods Patients had a diagnosis of nonmyeloid malignancy with 8 weeks of planned chemotherapy, age 18 years, and anemia (hemoglobin 11 g/dL). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DA 200 µg every two weeks (Q2W) or EA 40,000 units every week (QW) for up to 16 weeks with identical dose adjustment rules. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of RBC transfusion (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The definition of noninferiority was that the upper 95% CI limit of the observed difference in RBC transfusions between groups was less than 11.5%; this noninferiority margin was based on the treatment effect observed in placebo-controlled EA studies.
Results Of 1,220 patients randomly assigned, 1,209 received one dose of the study drug. Common tumor types were lung (26%), breast (21%), and gastrointestinal (18%). Transfusion incidence from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase (the primary end point) was 21% in the DA group and 16% in the EA group; noninferiority was concluded because the upper 95% CI limit of the difference between groups (10.8%) was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. Sensitivity analyses using alternate statistical methods and analysis sets yielded similar results. Hemoglobin, quality of life, and safety end points further support equivalency of the erythropoietic therapies.
Conclusion This large, phase III study demonstrates comparable efficacy of DA Q2W and EA QW. Less frequent dosing offers potential benefits for patients, caregivers and health care providers.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Epoetin Alfa and Darbepoetin Alfa Go Head to Head
David P. Steensma and Charles L. Loprinzi
JCO 2006 24: 2233-2236
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Beslija, J. Bonneterre, H. J. Burstein, V. Cocquyt, M. Gnant, V. Heinemann, J. Jassem, W. J. Kostler, M. Krainer, S. Menard, et al.
Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2009;
20(11):
1771 - 1785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Song, S. R Long, W. D Marder, S. D Sullivan, and J. Kallich
The Impact of Methodological Approach on Cost Findings in Comparison of Epoetin Alfa with Darbepoetin Alfa
Ann. Pharmacother.,
July 1, 2009;
43(7):
1203 - 1210.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Courneya, L. W. Jones, C. J. Peddle, C. M. Sellar, T. Reiman, A. A. Joy, N. Chua, L. Tkachuk, and J. R. Mackey
Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training in Anemic Cancer Patients Receiving Darbepoetin Alfa: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Oncologist,
September 1, 2008;
13(9):
1012 - 1020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pedrazzoli, A. Farris, S. Del Prete, F. Del Gaizo, D. Ferrari, C. Bianchessi, G. Colucci, A. Desogus, T. Gamucci, A. Pappalardo, et al.
Randomized Trial of Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Patients With Chemotherapy-Related Anemia Without Iron Deficiency Treated With Darbepoetin Alfa
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1619 - 1625.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S Shord, J.M. Hamilton Jr, and S. Cuellar
Parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for chemotherapy-induced anemia
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
March 1, 2008;
14(1):
5 - 22.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Steensma
Is Anemia of Cancer Different From Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2008;
26(7):
1022 - 1024.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Shankar
The Role of Recombinant Erythropoietin in Childhood Cancer
Oncologist,
February 1, 2008;
13(2):
157 - 166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Muller and D. Baribeault
Extended-dosage-interval regimens of erythropoietic agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.,
December 15, 2007;
64(24):
2547 - 2556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Crawford
Erythropoietin: High Profile, High Scrutiny
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2007;
25(9):
1021 - 1023.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bleyer
Epoetin Versus Darbepoetin Conundrum Compromise
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2006;
24(25):
e46 - e46.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Steensma and C. L. Loprinzi
Epoetin Alfa and Darbepoetin Alfa Go Head to Head
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2006;
24(15):
2233 - 2236.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|