Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 18 (June 20), 2006: pp. 2910-2916
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1526

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nieto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nieto, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REVIEW ARTICLE

Prognostic Value of Nodal Ratios in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Wendy A. Woodward, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Naoto T. Ueno, Yee Chung Cheng, Melanie Royce, Patricia Tai, Georges Vlastos, Anne Marie Wallace, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Yago Nieto

From the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Breast Medical Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oncology Center and Management of Healthcare Data, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Departments of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, and Surgery, University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Albuquerque, NM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Allan Blair Cancer Center, Regina, Canada; Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Senology, and Gynecologic Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; and the Department of Hematology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Address reprint requests to Wendy A. Woodward, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: wwoodward{at}mdanderson.org

PURPOSE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer was recently updated to reflect the impact of increasing the absolute number of positive lymph nodes on prognosis. However, numerous studies suggest that nodal ratios (absolute number of involved nodes–number of nodes resected) may have greater prognostic value than absolute numbers of involved nodes. Here we examine the data supporting the use of nodal ratios in breast cancer prognosis and consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of including nodal ratios in breast cancer staging.

METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the following search engines: http://www.google.com; Thomson's ISI Web of Science; PubMed.

RESULTS: In multiple reports from both prospective and retrospectively collected data sets, nodal ratios have been shown to be significant predictors of outcome, including locoregional recurrence and overall survival. These studies span all stages of breast cancer and include various treatments as well as various statistical approaches.

CONCLUSION: There is considerable data supporting the use of nodal ratios in breast cancer prognosis. A thorough and methodological evaluation of the potential prognostic importance of nodal ratios in large multicenter data sets is merited and is currently being undertaken by the International Nodal Ratio Working Group.

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Vinh-Hung, H. M. Verkooijen, G. Fioretta, G. Vlastos, E. Rapiti, and C. Bouchardy
Reply to V. Van Belle et al
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2009; 27(30): e152 - e152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Vinh-Hung, H. M. Verkooijen, G. Vlastos, G. Fioretta, I. Neyroud-Caspar, E. Rapiti, and C. Bouchardy
Reply to K.M. Musallam et al
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2009; 27(24): e68 - e69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Vinh-Hung, H. M. Verkooijen, G. Fioretta, I. Neyroud-Caspar, E. Rapiti, G. Vlastos, C. Deglise, M. Usel, J.-M. Lutz, and C. Bouchardy
Lymph Node Ratio as an Alternative to pN Staging in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2009; 27(7): 1062 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. S. Russell, I. H. Kunkler, G. van Tienhoven, P. A. Canney, J. Thomas, J. Bartlett, M. J. van de Vijver, Y. Belkacemi, J. R. Yarnold, and P. J. Barrett-Lee
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Will the Selective Use of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Study End the Debate?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2009; 27(6): 996 - 997.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Ricciardi and N. N. Baxter
Association Versus Causation Versus Quality Improvement: Setting Benchmarks for Lymph Node Evaluation in Colon Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 414 - 415.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online