Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3034 on June 5 2006
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 19 (July 1), 2006: pp. 3019-3025
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Estrogen-Independent Proliferation Is Present in Estrogen-Receptor HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Letrozole
Matthew J. Ellis,
Yu Tao,
Oliver Young,
Sharon White,
Alan D. Proia,
Julliette Murray,
Lorna Renshaw,
Dana Faratian,
Jeremy Thomas,
Mitch Dowsett,
Andreas Krause,
Dean B. Evans,
William R. Miller,
J. Michael Dixon
From the Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Edinburgh Breast Unit, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, Scotland; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Address reprint requests to Matthew J. Ellis, MB, PhD, FRCP, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8056, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: mellis{at}wustl.edu
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1 and HER2 gene amplification on endocrine therapy responsiveness, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study was conducted on tumor samples from 305 postmenopausal patients with stage II and III estrogen receptor (ER) positive (ER 10%) breast cancers treated on two independent neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: FISH analysis focused on HER1 and/or HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) -positive patients and a random selection of HER1/2 IHC-negative patients. HER2 FISH status was correlated with response and changes in the proliferation marker Ki67.
RESULTS: HER1 was rarely amplified (< 1%), and HER2 amplification was observed in 9.2% of patients. Letrozole response by clinical measurement (71% HER2 FISH positive v 71% HER2 FISH negative), mammogram (44% HER2 FISH positive v 47% HER2 FISH negative), or ultrasound (47% HER2 FISH positive v 54% HER2 FISH negative) was not impaired by HER2 FISH-positive status. In contrast, HER2 FISH-positive tumors showed higher histologic grade (P = .009), higher pretreatment Ki67 (P = .005), and less Ki67 suppression after letrozole when compared with HER2 FISH-negative tumors (P = .0001). Similar observations regarding Ki67 were made in a smaller cohort of tamoxifen-treated tumors.
CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant letrozole is clinically effective in ER-positive HER2 FISH-positive tumors, indicating sensitivity to short-term estrogen deprivation. However, continued proliferation despite ongoing letrozole or tamoxifen treatment in the majority of ER-positive HER2 FISH-positive samples (88%) could imply therapeutic resistance that may manifest later in the clinical course of the disease. Discordance between clinical and biomarker findings in this study serves to emphasize the need for surrogate end point validation in neoadjuvant endocrine trials through correlation with information on long-term outcomes.
Supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland (M.J.E., J.M.D., and W.R.M.) and by National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA0961402 and P30CA9184205 (M.J.E.).
Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 13-17, 2005.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. U. Buzdar
Role of biologic therapy and chemotherapy in hormone receptor- and HER2-positive breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2009;
20(6):
993 - 999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Dixon and E. J. Macaskill
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
39 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Arpino, L. Wiechmann, C. K. Osborne, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and the HER Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Family: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Implications for Endocrine Therapy Resistance
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2008;
29(2):
217 - 233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dowsett, C. Allred, J. Knox, E. Quinn, J. Salter, C. Wale, J. Cuzick, J. Houghton, N. Williams, E. Mallon, et al.
Relationship Between Quantitative Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Expression and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) Status With Recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2008;
26(7):
1059 - 1065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. Rugo
The breast cancer continuum in hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: evolving management options focusing on aromatase inhibitors
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2008;
19(1):
16 - 27.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dowsett
Factors Predicting Response and Resistance to Endocrine Therapy of Breast Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
14 - 17.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Winer, J. R. Harris, B. L. Smith, H. A. D'Alessandro, and E. F. Brachtel
Case 32-2007 -- A 62-Year-Old Woman with a Second Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 18, 2007;
357(16):
1640 - 1648.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kubista, J. V.M. Planellas Gomez, M. Dowsett, J.-M. Foidart, K. Pohlodek, R. Serreyn, M. Nechushkin, A. G. Manikhas, V. F. Semiglazov, C. C.M. Hageluken, et al.
Effect of Tibolone on Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation in Postmenopausal ER+ Patients: Results from STEM Trial
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2007;
13(14):
4185 - 4190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Massarweh and R. Schiff
Unraveling the Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2007;
13(7):
1950 - 1954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|