This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blazeby, J. M. Articles by Donovan, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blazeby, J. M. Articles by Donovan, J. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgical Oncology

Jane M. Blazeby, Kerry Avery, Mirjam Sprangers, Hynek Pikhart, Peter Fayers, Jenny Donovan

From the Department of Social Medicine and Clinical Sciences at South Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London; Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Hospital Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and the Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway

Address reprint requests to Jane M. Blazeby, MD, Level 7, Surgery, Clinical Sciences at South Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom; e-mail: j.m.blazeby{at}bristol.ac.uk

PURPOSE: There is debate about the value of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) in clinical trials in oncology because of evidence suggesting that HRQL does not influence clinical decisions. Analysis of HRQL in surgical trials, however, may inform decision making because it provides detailed assessment of the immediate detrimental short-term impact of surgery on HRQL that needs to be considered against the long-term survival benefits and functional outcomes of surgery. This study evaluated whether HRQL in randomized trials in surgical oncology contributes to clinical decision making.

METHODS: A systematic review identified randomized trials in surgical oncology with HRQL. Trials were evaluated independently by two reviewers and the value of HRQL in clinical decision making was categorized in three ways: whether trial investigators reported that HRQL influenced final treatment recommendations, whether trial investigators reported that HRQL would be useful for informed consent, and whether HRQL was assessed robustly according to predefined criteria.

RESULTS: Thirty-three randomized trials with valid HRQL questionnaires were identified; 22 (67%) concluded that HRQL outcomes influenced treatment decisions or provided valuable data for informed consent, and seven of these trials had robust HRQL design. Another five trials had robust HRQL design but investigators reported that HRQL outcomes were not clinically important enough to influence treatment recommendations.

CONCLUSION: In surgical trials in oncology, HRQL informed clinical decision making. It is recommended that HRQL be included in relevant surgical trials, and that information be used to inform clinicians and patients about the impact of surgery on short- and long-term HRQL.

Authors' disclosures of potential con- flicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.-J. Au, C. S. Karapetis, C. J. O'Callaghan, D. Tu, M. J. Moore, J. R. Zalcberg, H. Kennecke, J. D. Shapiro, S. Koski, N. Pavlakis, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab: Overall and KRAS-Specific Results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1822 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. Onate-Ocana, A. Alcantara-Pilar, D. Vilar-Compte, G. Garcia-Hubard, E. Rojas-Castillo, S. Alvarado-Aguilar, J. F. Carrillo, J. M. Blazeby, and V. Aiello-Crocifoglio Validation of the Mexican Spanish Version of the EORTC C30 and STO22 Questionnaires for the Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Gastric Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2009; 16(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Parameswaran, A. McNair, K. N. L. Avery, R. G. Berrisford, S. A. Wajed, M. A. G. Sprangers, and J. M. Blazeby The Role of Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Clinical Decision Making in Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2372 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Pucciarelli, P. Del Bianco, P. Toppan, S. Serpentini, F. Efficace, L. M. Pasetto, M. L. Friso, G. L. De Salvo, and D. Nitti Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Disease-Free Survivors of Mid-Low Rectal Cancer After Curative Surgery Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 15(7): 1846 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Efficace, A. Novik, M. Vignetti, F. Mandelli, and C. S. Cleeland Health-related quality of life and symptom assessment in clinical research of patients with hematologic malignancies: where are we now and where do we go from here? Haematologica, December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1596 - 1598. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Rock, J. A. Scott, D. L. Kennedy, R. Sridhara, R. Pazdur, and L. B. Burke Challenges to Use of Health-Related Quality of Life for Food and Drug Administration Approval of Anticancer Products J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2007; 2007(37): 27 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Efficace, D Osoba, C Gotay, M Sprangers, C Coens, and A Bottomley Has the quality of health-related quality of life reporting in cancer clinical trials improved over time? Towards bridging the gap with clinical decision making Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 775 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]