Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 21 (July 20), 2006: pp. 3401-3407
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5724

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, K. C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fearon, K. C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Eicosapentaenoic Acid Diester in Patients With Cancer Cachexia

Kenneth C.H. Fearon, Matthew D. Barber, Alastair G. Moses, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Gillian S. Taylor, Michael J. Tisdale, Gordon D. Murray

From the Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), Royal Infirmary; Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University Medical School, Edinburgh; Academic Unit of Supportive Care, The University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and the Pharmaceuticals Sciences Institute, CRC Nutritional Biochemistry Research Group Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Address reprint requests to Kenneth C.H. Fearon, MD, Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA United Kingdom; e-mail: k.fearon{at}ed.ac.uk

PURPOSE: Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has been proposed to have specific anticachectic effects. This trial compared EPA diethyl ester with placebo in cachectic cancer patients for effects on weight and lean body mass.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred eighteen weight-losing patients with advanced gastrointestinal or lung cancer were studied in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a novel preparation of pure EPA at a dose of 2 g or 4 g daily or placebo (2g EPA, n = 175; 4 g EPA, n = 172; placebo, n = 171). Patients were assessed at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

RESULTS: The groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean weight loss at baseline was 18% (n = 518). Over the 8-week treatment period, both intention-to-treat analysis and per protocol analysis revealed no statistically significant improvements in survival, weight, or other nutritional variables. There was, however, a trend in favor of EPA with analysis of the primary end point, weight, at 8 weeks showing a borderline, nonsignificant treatment effect (P = .066). Relative to placebo, mean weight increased by 1.2 kg with 2 g EPA (95% CI, 0 kg to 2.3 kg) and by 0.3 kg with 4g EPA (–0.9 kg to 1.5 kg).

CONCLUSION: The results indicate no statistically significant benefit from single agent EPA in the treatment of cancer cachexia. Future studies should concentrate on other agents or combination regimens.

Supported by Scotia Pharmaceuticals, United Kingdom.

Presented in part at the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in Brussels, Belgium 2005.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
F. Bozzetti and L. Mariani
Defining and Classifying Cancer Cachexia: A Proposal by the SCRINIO Working Group
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2009; 33(4): 361 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
L. Radbruch, F. Strasser, F. Elsner, J. F. Goncalves, J. Loge, S. Kaasa, F. Nauck, P. Stone, and the Research Steering Committee of the European As
Fatigue in palliative care patients -- an EAPC approach
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 13 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. D. Loberg, D. A. Bradley, S. A. Tomlins, A. M. Chinnaiyan, and K. J. Pienta
The Lethal Phenotype of Cancer: The Molecular Basis of Death Due to Malignancy
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2007; 57(4): 225 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Ma and A. Jatoi
Wine for Appetite Loss: "How Do You Know?"
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 25(10): 1285 - 1287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Acharyya and D. C. Guttridge
Cancer Cachexia Signaling Pathways Continue to Emerge Yet Much Still Points to the Proteasome
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1356 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online