Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 21 (July 20), 2006: pp. 3451-3457
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6699

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed for Second-Line Treatment of Transitional Cell Cancer of the Urothelium

Christopher J. Sweeney, Bruce J. Roth, Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, David J. Vaughn, Michael Arning, Rafael E. Curiel, Coleman K. Obasaju, Yanping Wang, Steven J. Nicol, Donald S. Kaufman

From the From Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; and the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Address reprint requests to Donald S. Kaufman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail: dskaufman{at}partners.org

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of pemetrexed as second-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had a performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ function, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced or metastatic TCC of the urothelium or relapsed within 1 year of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days, with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone prophylaxis.

RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat efficacy analysis. Responses: 3 (6.4%) complete responses and 10 (21.3%) partial responses produced an overall response rate of 27.7%. Ten patients (21.3%) had stable disease and 22 patients (46.8%) progressed. The median time to progressive disease was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.7 months to 4.6 months) and median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 5.1 months to 14.6 months). Median duration of response was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.9 months to 13.8 months). Of the 47 patients assessable for safety, grade 3 or 4 hematologic events were thrombocytopenia (8.5%; 0.0%), neutropenia (4.3%; 4.3%) and anemia (2.1%; 2.1%), respectively. Nonlaboratory toxicities included grade 4 stomatitis/pharyngitis, sepsis syndrome (one patient each), and grade 3 fatigue (three patients) and diarrhea (two patients).

CONCLUSION: Single-agent pemetrexed is safe and active as second-line treatment of patients with advanced TCC of the urothelium. Additional evaluation in the first- or second-line setting in TCC of the urothelium is warranted.

Supported by a grant from Eli Lilly Oncology, Indianapolis, IN.

Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago, IL, May 31-June 3, 2003, and the 21st Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium New York, NY, November 12-15, 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
G. Sonpavde, A. A. Elfiky, and J. E. Rosenberg
Review: Novel agents for advanced bladder cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, July 1, 2009; 1(1): 37 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Suyama, T. Ueda, S. Fukasawa, Y. Imamura, K. Nakamura, K. Miyasaka, T. Sazuka, K.-i. Egoshi, N. Nihei, M. Hamano, et al.
Combination of Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2009; 39(4): 244 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
C. Sweeney, D. F. Bajorin, and C. N. Sternberg
Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: What Have We Learned and What's New on the Horizon?
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 200 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online