|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 22 (August 1), 2006: pp. 3597-3603 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0632 Decision Analysis for Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer
From the Department of Biostatistics & Applied Mathematics, and Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center Korea, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea Address reprint requests to J. Jack Lee, PhD, Department of Biostatistics & Applied Mathematics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 447, Houston, TX 77030-4009; e-mail: jjlee{at}mdanderson.org PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown to provide survival benefit in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) who have achieved complete response. However, PCI may also produce long-term neurotoxicity (NT). The benefits and risks of PCI in LD-SCLC are evaluated. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to compare quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) in a cohort of SCLC patients who do or do not receive PCI by varying survival rates and the frequency and severity of PCI-related NT. Sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the robustness of the optimal decision. RESULTS: At current published survival rates (26% 5-year survival rate with PCI and 22% without PCI) and a low NT rate, PCI offered a benefit over no PCI (QALE = 4.31 and 3.70 for mild NT severity; QALE = 4.09 and 3.70 for substantial NT severity, respectively). With a moderate NT rate, PCI was still preferred. If the PCI survival rate increased to 40%, PCI outperformed no PCI with a mild NT severity. However, no PCI was preferred over PCI (QALE = 5.72 v 5.47) with substantial NT severity. Two-way sensitivity analyses showed that PCI was preferred for low NT rates, mild NT severity, and low long-term survival rates. Otherwise, no PCI was preferred. CONCLUSION: The current data suggest PCI offers better QALE than no PCI in LD-SCLC patients who have achieved complete response. As the survival rate for SCLC patients continues to improve, NT rate and NT severity must be controlled to maintain a favorable benefit-risk ratio for recommending PCI. Supported in part by the National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA16672 and CA91844, and the Department of Defense Grants No. DAMD17-01-1-0689, DAMD17-02-1-0706, and W81XWH-04-1-0142. J.J.L. and B.N.B. contributed equally to the work. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|