Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 24 (August 20), 2006: pp. 3919-3926
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0352

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kröger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nitz, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kröger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nitz, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Trial of Single Compared With Tandem High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chemotherapy-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Nicolaus Kröger, Markus Frick, Oleg Gluz, Svjetlana Mohrmann, Bernd Metzner, Christian Jackisch, Yon Ko, Hans-Walter Lindemann, Carl Richard Meier, Hans Peter Lohrmann, Ute Ruffert, Matthias Hänel, Heinrich Bodenstein, Andreas Neubauer, Gerhard Ehninger, Hans-Heinrich Wolf, Kathrin Kolbe, Karin Burock, Axel R. Zander, Ulrike Nitz

From the Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Transfusion Medicine, and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Centre, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf; Department of Oncology/Hematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Münster, Münster; Department of Oncology/ Hematology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; Department of Hematology/ Oncology, Catholic Hospital, Hagen, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten; Department of Oncology/Hematology, Zentralkrankenhaus St Jürgensstraße, Bremen; Department of Oncology/ Hematology, Klinikum Lippe-Lemgo, Lemgo; Thüringer Institut für Blutzellanalyse und therapy (IBAT), Jena; Department of Oncology/Hematology, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Klinikum Minden, Minden; Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg; Department of Oncology/ Hematology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden; Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle; Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz; and WISP Research Institute, Langenfeld, Germany

Address reprint requests to Nicolaus Kröger, MD, Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; e-mail: nkroeger{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

PURPOSE: To compare progression-free survival between single and tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1997 and June 2001, 187 patients with complete and partial remission were randomly assigned to receive either one or two cycles of HDT, consisting of thiotepa (125 mg/m2/d for 4 days), cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m2/d for 4 days), and carboplatin (200 mg/m2/d for 4 days), followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation.

RESULTS: One hundred seventy one of 187 randomly assigned patients completed first HDT, but only 52 of 85 completed the second HDT cycle in the tandem HDT arm. The rate of complete remission on an intent-to-treat-basis was 33% in the single-dose HDT arm and 37% in the tandem HDT arm (P = .48). The median progression-free survival times in single and tandem HDT arms were 9.4 and 11.2 months, respectively (one-sided P = .06; two one-sided P = .12), whereas median overall survival time tended to be greater after single versus tandem HDT (29 v 23.5 months, respectively; P = .4). In a multivariate analysis for progression-free survival, tandem HDT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98; P = .03) and achievement of complete remission after induction chemotherapy (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.96; P = .03) were factors for a better progression-free survival, whereas the factor of three or more sites of metastases (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.47; P = .01) was associated with a worse progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION: Despite a trend of improved progression-free survival, tandem HDT cannot be recommended for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer because of a trend for shorter overall survival and higher toxicity compared with single HDT.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Crump, S. Gluck, D. Tu, D. Stewart, M. Levine, P. Kirkbride, J. Dancey, S. O'Reilly, T. Shore, S. Couban, et al.
Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Peripheral-Blood Stem-Cell Support Compared With Standard-Dose Chemotherapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: NCIC MA.16
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 26(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online