Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.8496 on August 8 2006

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 26 (September 10), 2006: pp. 4228-4235
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michael, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zalcberg, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michael, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zalcberg, J. R.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial

Relationship of Hepatic Functional Imaging to Irinotecan Pharmacokinetics and Genetic Parameters of Drug Elimination

Michael Michael, Mick Thompson, Rod J. Hicks, Paul L. Mitchell, Andrew Ellis, Alvin D. Milner, Julia Di Iulio, Andrew M. Scott, Volker Gurtler, Janelle M. Hoskins, Stephen J. Clarke, Niall C. Tebbut, Kian Foo, Michael Jefford, John R. Zalcberg

From the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Centre for Molecular Imaging, Pharmacology, and Developmental Therapeutics Unit, and Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Austin Hospital, Melbourne; Ludwig Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, and Department of Microbiology, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Address reprint requests to Michael Michael, MD, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia; e-mail: Michael.Michael{at}petermac.org

Purpose: The marked variability of irinotecan (Ir) clearance warrants individualized dosing based on hepatic drug handling. The aims of this trial were to identify parameters from functional hepatic nuclear imaging (HNI) that correlate with (1) Ir pharmacology, and (2) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) and UGT-1A1 genes, known to influence Ir handling.

Methods: Patients underwent genotyping for ABCB1 SNPs and UTUGT-1A1*28 carriage and HNI with 99mTc-DIDA (acetanilidoiminodiacetic acid)/ 99mTc-DISIDA (disofenin) and MIBI (99mTc-sestamibi) scans, probes for biliary transport proteins ABCC1 and -2, and ABCB1 function. HNI data were analyzed by noncompartmental and deconvolutional analysis to provide hepatic extraction and biliary excretion parameters. Patients received Ir, fluorouracil, and folinic acid using a weekly x2, every-3-weeks schedule. Plasma was taken for Ir and SN-38 analysis on day 1, cycle 1.

Results: Of the 21 patients accrued, Ir pharmacokinetics data were obtained from 16 patients. 99mTc-DIDA/DISIDA percent retention at 1 hour (1-hour RET) correlated to baseline serum bilirubin (P = .008). Both 99mTc-DIDA/DISIDA and MIBI 1-hour RET correlated with SN-38 area under the curve (AUC; P < .01). On multiple regression analysis, SN-38 AUC = –215 + 18.68 x bilirubin + 4.27 x MIBI 1-hour RET (P = .009, R2 = 44.2%). HNI parameters did not correlate with Ir toxicity or UGT1A1*28 carriage. MIBI excretion was prolonged in patients with the ABCB1 exon 26 TT variant allele relative to wild-type (P = .015).

Conclusion: Functional imaging of hepatic uptake and excretory pathways may have potential to predict Ir pharmacokinetics. Evaluation of a larger cohort as well as polymorphisms in other biliary transporters and UGT1A1 alleles is warranted.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on August 7, 2006.

Supported by in part by a research grant provided by Pfizer Proprietary Ltd.

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, June 5-8, 2004.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Related Editorial

  • Role for Drug Transporters Beyond Tumor Resistance: Hepatic Functional Imaging and Genotyping of Multidrug Resistance Transporters for the Prediction of Irinotecan Toxicity
    Deanna L. Kroetz
    JCO 2006 24: 4225-4227 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. H.J. Mathijssen, F. A. de Jong, W. J. Loos, J. M. van der Bol, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom
Flat-Fixed Dosing Versus Body Surface Area Based Dosing of Anticancer Drugs in Adults: Does It Make a Difference?
Oncologist, August 1, 2007; 12(8): 913 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. L. Kroetz
Role for Drug Transporters Beyond Tumor Resistance: Hepatic Functional Imaging and Genotyping of Multidrug Resistance Transporters for the Prediction of Irinotecan Toxicity
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4225 - 4227.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online