|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5784 on December 12 2005 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Randomized Trial Comparing Axillary Clearance Versus No Axillary Clearance in Older Patients With Breast Cancer: First Results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-93International Breast Cancer Study GroupAddress reprint requests to Carl-Magnus Rudenstam, MD, West Swedish Breast Cancer Study Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden; e-mail: c-m.rudenstam{at}telia.com Purpose Axillary clearance in early breast cancer aims to improve locoregional control and provide staging information but is associated with undesirable morbidity. We therefore investigated whether avoiding axillary surgery in older women would result in improved quality of life (QL) with similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Patients and Methods Between 1993 and 2002, women Results A total of 473 patients (234 to Sx + Ax, 239 to Sx) were randomly assigned. The median age was 74 years; 80% had estrogen receptor–positive disease. In both the patients' subjective assessment of their QL and the physicians' perception of the patients' QL, the largest adverse QL effects of Ax were observed from baseline to the first postoperative assessment, but the differences tended to disappear in 6 to 12 months. At a median follow-up of 6.6 years, results for Sx + Ax and Sx yielded similar DFS (6-year DFS, 67% v 66%; hazard ratio [HR] Sx + Ax/Sx, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.42; P = .69) and OS (6-year OS, 75% v 73%; HR Sx + Ax/Sx, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.46; P = .77).
Conclusion Avoiding axillary clearance for women From the International Breast Cancer Study Group. Appendix lists the names and affiliations of the writing committee, and participants and authors of Trial 10-93 Supported in part by the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, The Cancer Council Australia, Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group (National Health Medical Research Council), National Cancer Institute (Grant No. CA-75362), Swedish Cancer Society, Cancer Association of South Africa, and Foundation for Clinical Research of Eastern Switzerland. Presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, June 5-8, 2004. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|