Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0294 on October 10 2006

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 31 (November 1), 2006: pp. 4963-4970
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Publisher's Note
Right arrow Erratum (v24,p5790)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cold, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cold, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Trial Comparing Three Doses of Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Vernon Harvey, Henning Mouridsen, Vladimir Semiglazov, Erik Jakobsen, Edouard Voznyi, Bridget A. Robinson, Vanina Groult, Michael Murawsky, Soeren Cold

From the Department of Oncology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland; Department of Oncology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Department of Oncology, Vejle Sygehus, Vejle; Department of Oncology, Odense Universitetssygehus, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg; Department of Oncology, Research Institute of Diagnostics and Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation; and Sanofi-Aventis, Antony, France; Sanofi-Aventis, Antony, France

Address reprint requests to Vernon Harvey, MD, Department of Oncology, Auckland Hospital, Private Bag 92-024, Auckland, New Zealand; e-mail: vernonh{at}adhb.govt.nz

Purpose To evaluate whether a relationship exists between docetaxel dose and clinical response in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Patients and Methods Patients whose cancer had progressed after one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced breast cancer or had recurred during or within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to docetaxel 60, 75, or 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks.

Results Five hundred twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned (intent to treat [ITT]), and 524 were assessable for toxicity. In the population assessable for efficacy (n = 407), logistic regression analysis showed that increasing docetaxel dose was significantly associated with higher response rate (P = .007) and improved time to progression (TTP; P = .014). In the ITT analysis, a significant dose-response relationship was observed for tumor response (P = .026) but not for TTP (P = .067). The incidences of most hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were related to increasing dose, with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurring in 76.4%, 83.7%, and 93.4% and febrile neutropenia occurring in 4.7%, 7.4%, and 14.1% of patients administered the 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 doses, respectively. One death was considered treatment related.

Conclusion A relationship between increasing dose of docetaxel and increased tumor response was observed across the dose range of 60 to 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Toxicities were related to increasing dose. Depending on the therapy goal, any of the doses studied may be appropriate for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on October 10, 2006.

Supported by Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Sparano, A. N. Makhson, V. F. Semiglazov, S. A. Tjulandin, O. I. Balashova, I. N. Bondarenko, N. V. Bogdanova, G. M. Manikhas, G. P. Oliynychenko, V. A. Chatikhine, et al.
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Significantly Improves Time to Progression Without Additive Cardiotoxicity Compared With Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant Anthracycline Therapy: Results From a Randomized Phase III Study
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2009; 27(27): 4522 - 4529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
N. Katsumata, T. Watanabe, H. Minami, K. Aogi, T. Tabei, M. Sano, N. Masuda, J. Andoh, T. Ikeda, T. Shibata, et al.
Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, and alternating AC and docetaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9802)
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2009; 20(7): 1210 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Chan, G. Romieu, J. Huober, T. Delozier, M. Tubiana-Hulin, A. Schneeweiss, A. Lluch, A. Llombart, A. du Bois, R. Kreienberg, et al.
Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Compared With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel for Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1753 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Bono, P.-L. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, T. Alanko, R. Kokko, R. Asola, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, S. Jyrkkio, V. Kataja, M. Leinonen, and H. Joensuu
Docetaxel 100 versus 80 mg/m2 as adjuvant treatments of early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of a randomised trial
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2009; 20(3): 595 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Chia, S. Dent, S. Ellard, P. M. Ellis, T. Vandenberg, K. Gelmon, J. Powers, W. Walsh, L. Seymour, and E. A. Eisenhauer
Phase II Trial of OGX-011 in Combination with Docetaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 15(2): 708 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. J. Goldstein, A. O'Neill, J. A. Sparano, E. A. Perez, L. N. Shulman, S. Martino, and N. E. Davidson
Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Is Not More Effective Than Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Operable Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E 2197
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 26(25): 4092 - 4099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. Francis, J. Crown, A. Di Leo, M. Buyse, A. Balil, M. Andersson, B. Nordenskjold, I. Lang, R. Jakesz, D. Vorobiof, et al.
Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Sequential or Concurrent Anthracycline and Docetaxel: Breast International Group 02 98 Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 121 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
K. W. Rahman, S. Ali, A. Aboukameel, S. H. Sarkar, Z. Wang, P. A. Philip, W. A. Sakr, and A. Raz
Inactivation of NF-{kappa}B by 3,3'-diindolylmethane contributes to increased apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agent in breast cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2007; 6(10): 2757 - 2765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, N. Personeni, F. Lebrun, M. J. Piccart, and F. Cardoso
Achievements in Systemic Therapies in the Pregenomic Era in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 253 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online