This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Earle, C. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Earle, C. C.

Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail: Improving the Quality of Care With Survivorship Care Plans

Craig C. Earle

From the Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Address reprint requests to Craig C. Earle, MD, Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, 454-STE 21-24, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: craig_earle{at}dfci.harvard.edu

The recent Institute of Medicine report "From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition" recommended the creation of survivorship care plans for patients as they complete primary therapy for cancer to ensure clarity for all involved about patients’ diagnoses, treatments received, and surveillance plans. Any previously existing follow-up guidelines for cancer survivors have been largely restricted to surveillance for recurrence of the primary disease. An important message of the Institute of Medicine report is that survivorship care plans must surpass this and address the chronic effects of cancer (pain, fatigue, premature menopause, depression/anxiety), monitoring for and preventing late effects like osteoporosis, heart disease, and second malignancies, and promoting healthy lifestyles. It should explicitly identify the providers responsible for each aspect of ongoing care and provide information on resources available for psychosocial and other practical issues that may arise as a result of the prior cancer diagnosis. Although having some sort of a plan is clearly necessary to achieve high quality care, there are practical barriers to formal off-treatment consultations and the creation of written documents that may become part of the medical record. This article reviews the elements of the proposed survivorship care plan and discusses areas of research and development needed to make them part of standard oncology practice.

Author’s disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Vargo The Oncology-Rehabilitation Interface: Better Systems Needed J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2610 - 2611. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Ganz and E. E. Hahn Implementing a Survivorship Care Plan for Patients With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Hewitt, A. Bamundo, R. Day, and C. Harvey Perspectives on Post-Treatment Cancer Care: Qualitative Research With Survivors, Nurses, and Physicians J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2270 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Rowland, M. Hewitt, and P. A. Ganz Cancer Survivorship: A New Challenge in Delivering Quality Cancer Care J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2006; 24(32): 5101 - 5104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Ganz Monitoring the Physical Health of Cancer Survivors: A Survivorship-Focused Medical History J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2006; 24(32): 5105 - 5111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]