Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 33 (November 20), 2006: pp. 5242-5246
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0268

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gandara, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gandara, D. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARBOPLATIN
*ETOPOSIDE
*PLATINUM COMPOUNDS
*TAXOL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Lung Cancer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase II Study of Consolidation Paclitaxel After Concurrent Chemoradiation in Poor-Risk Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S9712

Angela M. Davies, Kari Chansky, Derick H.M. Lau, Bryan R. Leigh, Laurie E. Gaspar, Geoffrey R. Weiss, Antoinette J. Wozniak, John J. Crowley, David R. Gandara

From the University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, CO; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Address reprint requests to Southwest Oncology Group (S9712), Operations Office, 14980 Omicron Dr, San Antonio, Texas 78245-3217; e-mail: angela.davies{at}ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

Purpose A previous Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study (S9429) demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in poor-risk stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated adding consolidation paclitaxel after chemoradiotherapy for a similar patient cohort.

Patients and Methods Patients with histologically/cytologically determined stage III NSCLC were eligible based on performance status (PS) 2 and either low albumin or weight loss more than 10%, poor pulmonary function, or comorbidities precluding cisplatin use. Treatment was carboplatin 200 mg/m2 days 1, 3, 29, and 31, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 days 1 through 4, and 29 to 32. Beginning day 1, thoracic radiation was delivered at 1.8 Gy in 25 fractions plus 16-Gy boost (total dose, 61 Gy). Patients without disease progression received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 21days for three cycles.

Results Characteristics of 87 eligible patients were age 51 to 82 years; 57% PS 0 to 1, 43% PS 2; and 51% stage IIIA, 49% stage IIIB. Toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy included grade 3 esophagitis (7%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (43%). Fifty-four assessable patients received paclitaxel consolidation. Four treatment-related deaths occurred during chemoradiotherapy and four occurred during consolidation. Overall response rate was 53%. Median progression free- and overall survival were 6.1 and 10.2 months, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 43% and 25%.

Conclusion Compared with a previous SWOG trial in a similar patient population, the addition of consolidation paclitaxel after chemoradiotherapy resulted in increased toxicity without a survival advantage. More PS 2 patients (43% v 18%) enrolled onto S9712, which may explain increased toxicity and lack of benefit. The optimal chemoradiotherapy approach for poor-risk patients remains to be defined.

Supported in part by the following Public Health Service Cooperative Agreement grants awarded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services: Grants No. CA38926, CA32102, CA46441, CA37981, CA22433, CA14028, CA35261, CA04919, CA46282, CA58658, CA52654, CA35128, CA35192, CA35431, CA45461, CA76448, CA45807, CA35176, CA12644, CA46136, CA27057, CA16385, CA67575, CA35996, CA58415, CA35119, CA20319, CA76447, CA68183, CA35178, CA67663, CA63844, CA58723, CA35281, CA45560, CA74647, and CA42777.

Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 18-21, 2002, Orlando, FL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online