|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 33 (November 20), 2006: pp. 5247-5252 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1605 Phase II Study of Etoposide and Cisplatin With Concurrent Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy Followed by Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902
From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Aichi Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi; Departments of Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Medical Center for Adults, Akashi, Hyogo; Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka; Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka City University Hospital; Department of Thoracic Malignancy, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Habikino; Department of Medical Oncology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osakasayama; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano; Department of Radiology, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Habikino, Osaka; Department of Medical Oncology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara; and the Health Service, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Address reprint requests to Hiroshi Saito, MD, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Aichi Hospital, 18 Kuriyado Kake-machi, Okazaki Aichi 444-0011, Japan; e-mail: hsaito{at}sun-inet.or.jp Purpose: We initially conducted a randomized phase II study to compare irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide (IPE) after etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We amended the protocol to evaluate IP after EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT in a single-arm phase II study because of an unacceptable toxicity in IPE. Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with LD-SCLC were treated intravenously with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 with concurrent twice-daily TRT (1.5 Gy per fraction, a total dose of 45 Gy) beginning on day 2 followed by three cycles of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. Results: Of the 51 patients enrolled, 49 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 88% and 41%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49% and 29.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months. The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 4, 84%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 31%), infection (grade 3 to 4, 33%), electrolytes imbalance (grade 3 to 4, 20%), and diarrhea (grade 3 to 4, 14%). Conclusion: EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT followed by the consolidation of IP appears to be an active regimen which deserves further phase III testing in patients with LD-SCLC. Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 31-June 3, 2003, Chicago, IL, and the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 5-8, 2004, New Orleans, LA. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|