|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 36 (December 20), 2006: pp. 5742-5749 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2679 Superiority of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in High-Risk Childhood T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results From ALL-BFM 90 and 95
From the Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Justus-Liebig University, Gießen; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Tübingen; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Essen; Department of General Pediatrics and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Robert-Rössle-Clinic at the HELIOS Clinic Berlin-Buch, Charité, Germany; Children's Hospital St Anna, Wien, Austria; and the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland Address reprint requests to Martin Schrappe, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schwanenweg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany; e-mail: m.schrappe{at}pediatrics.uni-kiel.de PURPOSE: The role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in first complete remission (CR1) for children with very highrisk (VHR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still under critical discussion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the ALLBerlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) 90 and ALL-BFM 95 trials, 387 patients were eligible for SCT if there was a matched sibling donor (MSD). T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patients with poor in vivo response to initial treatment represented the largest homogeneous subgroup within VHR patients. RESULTS: Of 191 high-risk (HR) T-ALL patients, 179 patients (94%) achieved CR1. Twenty-three patients received an MSD-SCT. Furthermore, in trial ALL-BFM 95, eight matched unrelated donors (MUDs) and five mismatched family donors (MMFDs) were used. The median time to SCT was 5 months (range, 2.4 to 10.8 months) from diagnosis. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 67% ± 8% for 36 patients who received an SCT in CR1 and 42% ± 5% for the 120 patients treated with chemotherapy alone having an event-free survival time of at least the median time to transplantation (Mantel-Byar, P = .01). Overall survival (OS) rate for the SCT group was 67% ± 8% at 5 years, whereas patients treated with chemotherapy alone had an OS rate of 47% ± 5% at 5 years (Mantel-Byar, P = .01). Outcome of patients who received MSD-SCT versus MUD-/MMFD-SCT was comparable (DFS, 65% ± 10% v 69% ± 13%, respectively). However, relapses only occurred after MSD-SCT (eight of 23 patients), whereas treatment-related mortality only occurred after MUD-/MMFD-SCT (four of 13 patients). CONCLUSION: SCT in CR1 is superior to treatment with chemotherapy alone for childhood HR-T-ALL. Supported by the Madeleine-Schickedanz-Kinderkrebsstiftung (Fürth, Germany) and the Deutsche Krebshilfe (Bonn, Germany; Project 50-2614-Ri 6). Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|