Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 4 (February 1), 2006: pp. 587-592
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8464

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mannel, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mannel, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Estrogen Replacement Therapy Versus Placebo in Stage I or II Endometrial Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Richard R. Barakat, Brian N. Bundy, Nick M. Spirtos, Jeffrey Bell, Robert S. Mannel

From the Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Cancer Center, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Riverside Methodist Hospital; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Address reprint requests to Denise Mackey, Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office, Four Penn Center, Ste 1020, 1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19103; e-mail: gynbreast{at}mskcc.org

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on recurrence rate and survival in women who have undergone surgery for stage I or II endometrial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgery, eligible patients were allocated to therapy with ERT or placebo after undergoing hysterectomy with or without pelvic and aortic nodal sampling. Planned duration of hormonal versus placebo treatment was 3 years, with an additional 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all 1,236 eligible and assessable patients was 35.7 months. Stage, grade, histologic subtype, and percentage of patients receiving adjuvant therapy were similarly distributed between the groups. The median age at diagnosis for the 618 patients randomly assigned to ERT was 57 years (range, 26 to 91 years). Two hundred fifty-one patients (41.1%) were compliant with ERT for the entire treatment period. Disease recurrence was experienced in 14 patients (2.3%). Eight patients (1.3%) developed a new malignancy. There were 26 deaths (4.2%), and five deaths (0.8%) were a result of endometrial cancer. The median age at diagnosis for the 618 patients in the placebo group was 57 years (range, 30 to 88 years). Twelve patients (1.9%) experienced disease recurrence. Ten patients (1.6%) developed a new malignancy. There were 9 deaths (3.1%) in the placebo group, and four deaths (0.6%) were a result of endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSION: Although this incomplete study cannot conclusively refute or support the safety of exogenous estrogen with regard to risk of endometrial recurrence, it is noteworthy that the absolute recurrence rate (2.1%) and the incidence of new malignancy were low.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant No. CA 27469 to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office and Grant No. CA 37517 to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. D. Wright, A. M. Buck, M. Shah, W. M. Burke, P. B. Schiff, and T. J. Herzog
Safety of Ovarian Preservation in Premenopausal Women With Endometrial Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2009; 27(8): 1214 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. N. Bakkum-Gamez, J. Gonzalez-Bosquet, N. N. Laack, A. Mariani, and S. C. Dowdy
Current Issues in the Management of Endometrial Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2008; 83(1): 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online