This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vehmanen, L. Articles by Saarto, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vehmanen, L. Articles by Saarto, T.

Tamoxifen Treatment After Adjuvant Chemotherapy Has Opposite Effects on Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Patients Depending on Menstrual Status

From the Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Address reprint requests to Leena Vehmanen, MD, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 180, FIN-00290 HUCH, Helsinki, Finland; e-mail: leena.vehmanen{at}kolumbus.fi

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen is a standard treatment option for women with intermediate or high-risk hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Premenopausal women treated with chemotherapy often develop early menopause and thus, enter a period of accelerated bone loss. We conducted a prospective study of the effect of sequential adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen on bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven premenopausal women with early breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors went on to tamoxifen 6 months after the beginning of the chemotherapy (tamoxifen group), while those with hormone receptor–negative tumors received no further therapy (control group). The effect of tamoxifen and menstrual status on BMD was studied.

RESULTS: Tamoxifen treatment and menopausal status correlated significantly with the changes in lumbar spine BMD (P < .0001). A significant bone loss was noted in those tamoxifen-treated patients who continued to menstruate after chemotherapy. At 3 years of follow-up, menstruating patients on tamoxifen had lost –4.6% of their baseline BMD values, while a modest gain of +0.6% was noted in the control group. In contrast, bone loss was reduced among tamoxifen-treated women as compared with controls in patients who developed chemotherapy-induced early menopause. In amenorrheic patients, the lumbar spine BMD values decreased –6.8% in tamoxifen users and –9.5% in the controls, respectively.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that tamoxifen usage was associated with bone loss in patients who continued to menstruate after adjuvant chemotherapy. On the contrary, tamoxifen decreased bone loss in those women who developed chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and authors contribution are found at the end of this article.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P Hadji Menopausal symptoms and adjuvant therapy-associated adverse events Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 73 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Gralow Bone Density in Breast Cancer: When to Intervene? J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3194 - 3197. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Sacco, K. A. Power, J. Chen, W. E. Ward, and L. U. Thompson Interaction of Sesame Seed and Tamoxifen on Tumor Growth and Bone Health in Athymic Mice Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2007; 232(6): 754 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]