|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 4 (February 1), 2006: pp. 681-687 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2722 Adding Gemcitabine to Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Combination Increases Survival in Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase II-III StudyFrom the Medical Oncology Department, Venezia; Medical Oncology Department, Centro Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano; Medical Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera, Padova; Medical Oncology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, Milano; Medical Oncology Department, Policlinico Universitario Modena; General Medicine Department, Pavia; Cardio-Thoracic Department, Universita di Pisa, Pisa; Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Caratiere Scientifico San Raffaele, Milano; Medical Oncology Department, Pordenone; Medical Oncology Department, Forlì; Institute for Scientific Intercharge Foundation, Torino, Italy; for the Gruppo di Studio Tumori Polmonari del Veneto (GSTPV) Address reprint requests to Adriano Paccagnella, MD, Medical Oncology Department, SS Giovanni and Paolo Hospital, Via Circonvallazione 50, 30174 Mestre-Venezia, Italy; e-mail: adriano.paccagnella{at}ulss12.ve.it PURPOSE: Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) is one of the reference combinations in the treatment of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No triplet novel agent combination has until now shown superiority over a two-drug combination for advanced NSCLC. We therefore conducted a clinical trial to test if paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine (PCG) increases overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR) over PC. METHODS: Stage IIIB patients not suitable for radical radiation treatment and stage IV chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and performance status of 0 to 2 were randomly assigned to PC arm (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 day 1/q21 days) or the PCG arm (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 21 days). RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were randomly assigned to the two arms. The RR for PC arm and PCG arm were 20.2% and 46% (P < .0001). The median time to the progression was 5.1 months in the PC group and 7.6 months in the PCG group (P = .012; hazard ratio [HR] 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.72). Median OS was 8.3 months and 10.8 months (P = .032; HR 1.309; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.67) in favor of the PCG arm. One-year survival was 34% (PC arm) and 45% (PCG arm; P = .032). Only hematologic toxicity (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) was significantly increased in the PCG arm and the experimental arm required more platelet and red blood cell transfusions, and more granulocyte colony-stimulating factor usage. No toxic/early deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: The PCG regimen offers a significant survival advantage over PC in advanced NSCLC, making PCG a treatment option for advanced NSCLC patients. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|