Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 8 (March 10), 2006: pp. 1228-1235
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7233
Physiologic and Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gliomas
Yue Cao,
Pia C. Sundgren,
Christina I. Tsien,
Thomas T. Chenevert,
Larry Junck
From the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Radiology, and Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Address reprint requests to Yue Cao, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH-B2C431, Box 0010, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0010; e-mail: yuecao{at}umich.edu
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides excellent soft tissue differentiation and in vivo assessment of physiologic and metabolic properties of tissue. As new and more aggressive treatment modalities and combined modalities are being investigated for brain tumor treatment, it is becoming more important to accurately define tumor volumes for treatment planning, to determine the most aggressive tumor regions for intensified radiation treatment, to identify early regional response to therapy for reoptimization of treatment, and to detect early indicators of developing normal tissue toxicity. Readily available MR techniques of physiologic and metabolic imaging can currently provide useful information regarding tumor tissue properties including chemical composition, cerebral blood volume, perfusion, vascular permeability, and water mobility. This article will focus on the potential value of MR physiologic and metabolic imaging in the clinical management of malignant gliomas.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Brandes, A. Tosoni, F. Spagnolli, G. Frezza, M. Leonardi, F. Calbucci, and E. Franceschi
Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2008;
10(3):
361 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Zhou, P. Guo, G. D. Kruh, P. Vicini, X. Wang, and J. M. Gallo
Predicting Human Tumor Drug Concentrations from a Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Model of Temozolomide Brain Disposition
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2007;
13(14):
4271 - 4279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. U. Lin and E. P. Winer
Brain Metastases: The HER2 Paradigm
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2007;
13(6):
1648 - 1655.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. M. Savage, A. P. Allen, J. H. Brown, J. F. Gillooly, A. B. Herman, W. H. Woodruff, and G. B. West
Scaling of number, size, and metabolic rate of cells with body size in mammals
PNAS,
March 13, 2007;
104(11):
4718 - 4723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. S. Lawrence, J. C. Buckner, and F. F. Lang
CNS Malignancies: At Last, Real Progress
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2006;
24(8):
1225 - 1227.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|