Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 11 (April 10), 2007: pp. 1316-1322
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.1218

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karakiewicz, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Patard, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karakiewicz, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Patard, J.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multi-Institutional Validation of a New Renal Cancer–Specific Survival Nomogram

Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Alberto Briganti, Felix K.-H. Chun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Paul Perrotte, Vincenzo Ficarra, Luca Cindolo, Alexandre De La Taille, Jacques Tostain, Peter F.A. Mulders, Laurent Salomon, Richard Zigeuner, Tommaso Prayer-Galetti, Denis Chautard, Antoine Valeri, Eric Lechevallier, Jean-Luc Descotes, Herve Lang, Arnaud Mejean, Jean-Jacques Patard

From the Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona; Urology Unit, G. Rummo Hospital, Benevento; Department of Urology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil; Department of Urology, North Hospital, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne; Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers; Department of Urology, Rennes 1 University Hospital, Rennes; Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, France; Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and the Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Address reprint requests to Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcome Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, 1058, rue St-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2X 3J4; e-mail: pierre.karakiewicz{at}umontreal.ca

Purpose We tested the hypothesis that the prediction of renal cancer–specific survival can be improved if traditional predictor variables are used within a prognostic nomogram.

Patients and Methods Two cohorts of patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors were used: one (n = 2,530) for nomogram development and for internal validation (200 bootstrap resamples), and a second (n = 1,422) for external validation. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses modeled the 2002 TNM stages, tumor size, Fuhrman grade, histologic subtype, local symptoms, age, and sex. The accuracy of the nomogram was compared with an established staging scheme.

Results Cancer-specific mortality was observed in 598 (23.6%) patients, whereas 200 (7.9%) died as a result of other causes. Follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 286 months (median, 38.8 months). External validation of the nomogram at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after nephrectomy revealed predictive accuracy of 87.8%, 89.2%, 86.7%, and 88.8%, respectively. Conversely, the alternative staging scheme predicting at 2 and 5 years was less accurate, as evidenced by 86.1% (P = .006) and 83.9% (P = .02) estimates.

Conclusion The new nomogram is more contemporary, provides predictions that reach further in time and, compared with its alternative, which predicts at 2 and 5 years, generates 3.1% and 2.8% more accurate predictions, respectively.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
T. B. Dorff, A. Goldkorn, and D. I. Quinn
Review: Targeted therapy in renal cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, November 1, 2009; 1(3): 183 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
O. Zivanovic, M. M. Leitao, A. Iasonos, L. M. Jacks, Q. Zhou, N. R. Abu-Rustum, R. A. Soslow, M. M. Juretzka, D. S. Chi, R. R. Barakat, et al.
Stage-Specific Outcomes of Patients With Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Comparison of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2009; 27(12): 2066 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Klatte, P. N. Rao, M. de Martino, J. LaRochelle, B. Shuch, N. Zomorodian, J. Said, F. F. Kabbinavar, A. S. Belldegrun, and A. J. Pantuck
Cytogenetic Profile Predicts Prognosis of Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2009; 27(5): 746 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. F. Shariat, J. Walz, C. G. Roehrborn, A. R. Zlotta, P. Perrotte, N. Suardi, F. Saad, and P. I. Karakiewicz
External Validation of a Biomarker-Based Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1526 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Iasonos, D. Schrag, G. V. Raj, and K. S. Panageas
How To Build and Interpret a Nomogram for Cancer Prognosis
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2008; 26(8): 1364 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online