Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.6356 on March 19 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 12 (April 20), 2007: pp. 1482-1488
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A Prospective Study of Plasma Prolactin Concentrations and Risk of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Shelley S. Tworoger,
A. Heather Eliassen,
Patrick Sluss,
Susan E. Hankinson
From the Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health; Reproductive Endocrinology Unit Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Address reprint requests to Shelley S. Tworoger, PhD, Channing Laboratory, 181 Longwood Ave, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: nhsst{at}channing.harvard.edu
Purpose Epidemiologic studies suggest that prolactin is associated with breast cancer risk in older women. Because of limited prospective data, particularly in younger women, we examined whether prolactin concentrations were associated with breast cancer risk among women 42 to 55 years (68% premenopausal) from the Nurses Health Study (NHS), and then conducted a pooled analysis of three studies.
Patients and Methods The analysis included 377 cases of breast cancer diagnosed after blood draw and before June 2000; two controls were matched per case on age, menopausal status at blood draw and diagnosis, fasting status, and time of day and month of blood collection. These data were pooled with two previously published data sets from the NHS and NHSII cohorts (n = 1,539 cases, 2,681 controls; ages 32 to 70 years).
Results Prolactin was modestly associated with an increased breast cancer risk (relative risk [RR], top v bottom quartile = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.9; P for trend = .12). Risk estimates did not vary by menopausal status, tumor invasiveness, or estrogen receptor (ER) status. In the pooled analysis, the overall RR was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6; P for trend = .002), and did not vary by menopausal status (P for interaction = .95). The risk was strongest for women with ER+ tumors (RR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0; P for trend < .001). Correcting for within-person variability, the RR comparing the median of the top versus the bottom prolactin quartile increased from 1.3 to 1.7 for all women and from 1.5 to 2.1 for ER+ cases.
Conclusion These data, in conjunction with experimental studies, indicate that prolactin likely is important in breast cancer etiology, particularly ER+ tumors, over a wide range of ages.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on March 19, 2007.
Supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA67262, CA50385, P01 CA87969, CA49449, P50 CA089393, and DAMD-17-02-1-0692. A.H.E. was supported by Cancer Education and Career Development Grant No. R25 CA 098566-2 from the National Cancer Institute.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Clapp, S. Thebault, M. C. Jeziorski, and G. Martinez De La Escalera
Peptide Hormone Regulation of Angiogenesis
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2009;
89(4):
1177 - 1215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Saetrom, J. Biesinger, S. M. Li, D. Smith, L. F. Thomas, K. Majzoub, G. E. Rivas, J. Alluin, J. J. Rossi, T. G. Krontiris, et al.
A Risk Variant in an miR-125b Binding Site in BMPR1B Is Associated with Breast Cancer Pathogenesis
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2009;
69(18):
7459 - 7465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kalleinen, P. Polo-Kantola, K. Irjala, T. Porkka-Heiskanen, T. Vahlberg, A. Virkki, and O. Polo
24-Hour Serum Levels of Growth Hormone, Prolactin, and Cortisol in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: The Effect of Combined Estrogen and Progestin Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
May 1, 2008;
93(5):
1655 - 1661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Kohen and H. J. Wildgust
The evolution of hyperprolactinaemia as an entity in psychiatric patients
J Psychopharmacol,
March 1, 2008;
22(2_suppl):
6 - 11.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Harvey, D. J. Everett, and C. J. Springall
Adverse effects of prolactin in rodents and humans: breast and prostate cancer
J Psychopharmacol,
March 1, 2008;
22(2_suppl):
20 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bushe, M. Shaw, and R. C Peveler
A review of the association between antipsychotic use and hyperprolactinaemia
J Psychopharmacol,
March 1, 2008;
22(2_suppl):
46 - 55.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bushe, D. Yeomans, T. Floyd, and S. M Smith
Categorical prevalence and severity of hyperprolactinaemia in two UK cohorts of patients with severe mental illness during treatment with antipsychotics
J Psychopharmacol,
March 1, 2008;
22(2_suppl):
56 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C Peveler, D. Branford, L. Citrome, P. Fitzgerald, P. W Harvey, R. I. Holt, L. Howard, D. Kohen, I. Jones, V. O'Keane, et al.
Antipsychotics and hyperprolactinaemia: Clinical recommendations
J Psychopharmacol,
March 1, 2008;
22(2_suppl):
98 - 103.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee
What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans?
Endocr. Rev.,
February 1, 2008;
29(1):
1 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|