Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 13 (May 1), 2007: pp. 1658-1664
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620
Open-Label Phase III Trial of Panitumumab Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Eric Van Cutsem,
Marc Peeters,
Salvatore Siena,
Yves Humblet,
Alain Hendlisz,
Bart Neyns,
Jean-Luc Canon,
Jean-Luc Van Laethem,
Joan Maurel,
Gary Richardson,
Michael Wolf,
Rafael G. Amado
From the University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven; Ghent University Hospital, Ghent; St Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain; Jules Bordet Institute; AZ Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Erasme University Hospital, Brussels; Centre Hospitalier Notre Dame et Reine Fabiola, Charleroi, Belgium; Ospedale Niguarda Cá Granda, Milan, Italy; Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Cabrini Hospital, Victoria, Australia; and Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
Address reprint requests to Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD, Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; e-mail: eric.vancutsem{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Purpose Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We compared the activity of panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC) to that of BSC alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed after standard chemotherapy.
Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 463 patients with 1% or more EGFR tumor cell membrane staining, measurable disease, and radiologic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months of most recent chemotherapy to panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus BSC (n = 231) or BSC alone (n = 232). Tumor assessments by blinded central review were scheduled from week 8 until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response, overall survival (OS), and safety. BSC patients who progressed could receive panitumumab in a cross-over study.
Results Panitumumab significantly prolonged PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.66, [P < .0001]). Median PFS time was 8 weeks (95% CI, 7.9 to 8.4) for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks (95% CI, 7.1 to 7.7) for BSC. Mean (standard error) PFS time was 13.8 (0.8) weeks for panitumumab and 8.5 (0.5) weeks for BSC. Objective response rates also favored panitumumab over BSC; after a 12-month minimum follow-up, response rates were 10% for panitumumab and 0% for BSC (P < .0001). No difference was observed in OS (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.22), which was confounded by similar activity of panitumumab after 76% of BSC patients entered the cross-over study. Panitumumab was well tolerated. Skin toxicities, hypomagnesaemia, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities observed. No patients had grade 3/4 infusion reactions.
Conclusion Panitumumab significantly improved PFS with manageable toxicity in patients with chemorefractory colorectal cancer.
Supported by Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, April 1-5, 2006, Washington, DC; 2nd Annual Conference of the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association, June 15-18, 2006, Orlando, FL; 8th Annual Conference of the World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, June 28-July 1, 2006, Barcelona, Spain; and at the 31st European Society of Medical Oncology Congress, September 29-October 3, 2006, Istanbul, Turkey.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Targeted Therapy Trials: Approval Strategies, Target Validation, or Helping Patients?
Paulo M. Hoff and Lee M. Ellis
JCO 2007 25: 1639-1641
[Full Text]
Related Correspondence
- Targeted Therapies: Cui Prodest?
Daris Ferrari and Paolo Foa
JCO 2007 25: 4691-4692
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. I. Cherny, A. P. Abernethy, F. Strasser, R. Sapir, D. Currow, and S. Y. Zafar
Improving the Methodologic and Ethical Validity of Best Supportive Care Studies in Oncology: Lessons From a Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2009;
27(32):
5476 - 5486.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Wirth, A. M. Allen, M. R. Posner, R. I. Haddad, Y. Li, J. R. Clark, P. M. Busse, A. W. Chan, L. A. Goguen, C. M. Norris, et al.
Phase I dose-finding study of paclitaxel with panitumumab, carboplatin and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck
Ann. Onc.,
November 5, 2009;
(2009)
mdp477v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Loupakis, C. Cremolini, G. Fontanini, I. Stasi, L. Salvatore, and A. Falcone
Review: Beyond KRAS: perspectives on new potential markers of intrinsic and acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
November 1, 2009;
1(3):
167 - 181.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Tang, G. R. Pond, and E. X. Chen
Influence of an independent review committee on assessment of response rate and progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials
Ann. Onc.,
October 29, 2009;
(2009)
mdp478v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Siena, A. Sartore-Bianchi, F. Di Nicolantonio, J. Balfour, and A. Bardelli
Biomarkers Predicting Clinical Outcome of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 7, 2009;
101(19):
1308 - 1324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grothey and D. J. Sargent
Reply to F. Montagnani et al
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2009;
27(28):
e134 - e135.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grothey
Review: Medical treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in 2009
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
September 1, 2009;
1(2):
55 - 68.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. PALMIROTTA, A. SAVONAROLA, V. FORMICA, G. LUDOVICI, G. DEL MONTE, M. ROSELLI, and F. GUADAGNI
A Novel K-ras Mutation in Colorectal Cancer. A Case Report and Literature Review
Anticancer Res,
August 1, 2009;
29(8):
3369 - 3374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Cohen, C. J. A. Punt, N. Iannotti, B. H. Saidman, K. D. Sabbath, N. Y. Gabrail, J. Picus, M. A. Morse, E. Mitchell, M. C. Miller, et al.
Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc.,
July 1, 2009;
20(7):
1223 - 1229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Fleming, M. D. Rothmann, and H. L. Lu
Issues in Using Progression-Free Survival When Evaluating Oncology Products
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 10, 2009;
27(17):
2874 - 2880.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Loupakis, L. Pollina, I. Stasi, A. Ruzzo, M. Scartozzi, D. Santini, G. Masi, F. Graziano, C. Cremolini, E. Rulli, et al.
PTEN Expression and KRAS Mutations on Primary Tumors and Metastases in the Prediction of Benefit From Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2009;
27(16):
2622 - 2629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Freeman, T. Bush, S. Ogbagabriel, B. Belmontes, T. Juan, C. Plewa, G. Van, C. Johnson, and R. Radinsky
Activity of panitumumab alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines expressing mutant epidermal growth factor receptor
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
June 1, 2009;
8(6):
1536 - 1546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gridelli, P. Maione, M. L. Ferrara, and A. Rossi
Cetuximab and Other Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist,
June 1, 2009;
14(6):
601 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Muro, T. Yoshino, T. Doi, K. Shirao, H. Takiuchi, Y. Hamamoto, H. Watanabe, B.-B. Yang, and D. Asahi
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2009;
39(5):
321 - 326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yasui, T. Yoshino, N. Boku, Y. Onozawa, S. Hironaka, A. Fukutomi, K. Yamazaki, K. Taku, T. Kojima, and N. Machida
Retrospective Analysis of S-1 Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Fluoropyrimidine and Irinotecan or to Fluoropyrimidine, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2009;
39(5):
315 - 320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. -L. Garm Spindler, N. Pallisgaard, A. A. Rasmussen, J. Lindebjerg, R. F. Andersen, D. Cruger, and A. Jakobsen
The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(5):
879 - 884.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-H. Kohne and H.-J. Lenz
Chemotherapy with Targeted Agents for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Oncologist,
May 1, 2009;
14(5):
478 - 488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Van Cutsem, J. Oliveira, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_4):
iv61 - iv63.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Van Cutsem, C.-H. Kohne, E. Hitre, J. Zaluski, C.-R. Chang Chien, A. Makhson, G. D'Haens, T. Pinter, R. Lim, G. Bodoky, et al.
Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
April 2, 2009;
360(14):
1408 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Barros Costa
Review Article: Targeted Therapy: Comprehensive Review
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine,
April 1, 2009;
26(2):
137 - 146.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Nielsen, P. Pfeiffer, and B. V. Jensen
Six cases of treatment with panitumumab in patients with severe hypersensitivity reactions to cetuximab
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2009;
20(4):
798 - 798.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kaulfuss, P. Burfeind, J. Gaedcke, and J.-G. Scharf
Dual silencing of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer cells is associated with decreased proliferation and enhanced apoptosis
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
April 1, 2009;
8(4):
821 - 833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Mutsaers, G. Francia, S. Man, C. R. Lee, J. M.L. Ebos, Y. Wu, L. Witte, S. Berry, M. Moore, and R. S. Kerbel
Dose-Dependent Increases in Circulating TGF-{alpha} and Other EGFR Ligands Act As Pharmacodynamic Markers for Optimal Biological Dosing of Cetuximab and Are Tumor Independent
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2009;
15(7):
2397 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yong, B. Tolner, S. Nagl, R.B. Pedley, K. Chester, A.J. Green, A. Mayer, S. Sharma, and R. Begent
Data standards for minimum information collection for antibody therapy experiments
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
March 1, 2009;
22(3):
221 - 224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sartore-Bianchi, M. Martini, F. Molinari, S. Veronese, M. Nichelatti, S. Artale, F. Di Nicolantonio, P. Saletti, S. De Dosso, L. Mazzucchelli, et al.
PIK3CA Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Are Associated with Clinical Resistance to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2009;
69(5):
1851 - 1857.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Giusti, M. H. Cohen, P. Keegan, and R. Pazdur
FDA Review of a Panitumumab (VectibixTM) Clinical Trial for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Oncologist,
March 1, 2009;
14(3):
284 - 290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hecht, E. Mitchell, T. Chidiac, C. Scroggin, C. Hagenstad, D. Spigel, J. Marshall, A. Cohn, D. McCollum, P. Stella, et al.
A Randomized Phase IIIB Trial of Chemotherapy, Bevacizumab, and Panitumumab Compared With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab Alone for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2009;
27(5):
672 - 680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Garfield
Other Problems With Phase III Best Supportive Care Studies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2009;
27(5):
829 - 829.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. BIR, A. A. FORA, C. LEVEA, and M. G. FAKIH
Spontaneous Regression of Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes
Anticancer Res,
February 1, 2009;
29(2):
465 - 468.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Papamichael, R. Audisio, J.-C. Horiot, B. Glimelius, J. Sastre, E. Mitry, E. Van Cutsem, M. Gosney, C.-H. Kohne, and M. Aapro
Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2009;
20(1):
5 - 16.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grothey
Optimized Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
209 - 211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Peeters, T. Price, and J.-L. Van Laethem
Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where Are We Today?
Oncologist,
January 1, 2009;
14(1):
29 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Di Nicolantonio, M. Martini, F. Molinari, A. Sartore-Bianchi, S. Arena, P. Saletti, S. De Dosso, L. Mazzucchelli, M. Frattini, S. Siena, et al.
Wild-Type BRAF Is Required for Response to Panitumumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2008;
26(35):
5705 - 5712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Wong and D. Cunningham
Using Predictive Biomarkers to Select Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer for Treatment With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibodies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2008;
26(35):
5668 - 5670.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Zafar, D. Currow, and A. P. Abernethy
Defining Best Supportive Care
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2008;
26(31):
5139 - 5140.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Riely and M. Ladanyi
KRAS Mutations: An Old Oncogene Becomes a New Predictive Biomarker
J. Mol. Diagn.,
November 1, 2008;
10(6):
493 - 495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Karapetis, S. Khambata-Ford, D. J. Jonker, C. J. O'Callaghan, D. Tu, N. C. Tebbutt, R. J. Simes, H. Chalchal, J. D. Shapiro, S. Robitaille, et al.
K-ras Mutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 23, 2008;
359(17):
1757 - 1765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Messersmith and D. J. Ahnen
Targeting EGFR in Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 23, 2008;
359(17):
1834 - 1836.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. O'Neil and R. M. Goldberg
Innovations in Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Update of Recent Clinical Trials
Oncologist,
October 1, 2008;
13(10):
1074 - 1083.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Personeni, S. Fieuws, H. Piessevaux, G. De Hertogh, J. De Schutter, B. Biesmans, W. De Roock, A. Capoen, M. Debiec-Rychter, J.-L. Van Laethem, et al.
Clinical Usefulness of EGFR Gene Copy Number as a Predictive Marker in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Cetuximab: A Fluorescent In situ Hybridization Study
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2008;
14(18):
5869 - 5876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Dodd, E. L. Korn, B. Freidlin, C. C. Jaffe, L. V. Rubinstein, J. Dancey, and M. M. Mooney
Blinded Independent Central Review of Progression-Free Survival in Phase III Clinical Trials: Important Design Element or Unnecessary Expense?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2008;
26(22):
3791 - 3796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Brake, C. Starnes, J. Lu, D. Chen, S. Yang, R. Radinsky, and L. Borges
Effects of Palifermin on Antitumor Activity of Chemotherapeutic and Biological Agents in Human Head and Neck and Colorectal Carcinoma Xenograft Models
Mol. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2008;
6(8):
1337 - 1346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Carethers
Review: Systemic treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: Tailoring therapy to the tumor
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology,
July 1, 2008;
1(1):
33 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Pozzo and C. Barone
Is There an Optimal Chemotherapy Regimen for the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer That Will Provide a Platform for the Introduction of New Biological Agents?
Oncologist,
July 1, 2008;
13(7):
794 - 806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hecht
Current and emerging therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer: Applying research findings to clinical practice
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.,
June 1, 2008;
65(11_Supplement_4):
S15 - S21.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lievre and P. Laurent-Puig
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2008;
26(15):
2601 - 2602.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. O'Connell, M. E. Campbell, R. M. Goldberg, A. Grothey, J.-F. Seitz, J. K. Benedetti, T. Andre, D. G. Haller, and D. J. Sargent
Survival Following Recurrence in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Findings From the ACCENT Data Set
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2008;
26(14):
2336 - 2341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Sobrero, J. Maurel, L. Fehrenbacher, W. Scheithauer, Y. A. Abubakr, M. P. Lutz, M. E. Vega-Villegas, C. Eng, E. U. Steinhauer, J. Prausova, et al.
EPIC: Phase III Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan After Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatin Failure in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2008;
26(14):
2311 - 2319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Baselga and N. Rosen
Determinants of RASistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1582 - 1584.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Amado, M. Wolf, M. Peeters, E. Van Cutsem, S. Siena, D. J. Freeman, T. Juan, R. Sikorski, S. Suggs, R. Radinsky, et al.
Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1626 - 1634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cappuzzo, G. Finocchiaro, E. Rossi, P.A. Janne, C. Carnaghi, C. Calandri, K. Bencardino, C. Ligorio, F. Ciardiello, T. Pressiani, et al.
EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2008;
19(4):
717 - 723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Peipp, T. Schneider-Merck, M. Dechant, T. Beyer, J. J. Lammerts van Bueren, W. K. Bleeker, P. W. H. I. Parren, J. G. J. van de Winkel, and T. Valerius
Tumor Cell Killing Mechanisms of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibodies Are Not Affected by Lung Cancer-Associated EGFR Kinase Mutations
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 2008;
180(6):
4338 - 4345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ciardiello and G. Tortora
EGFR Antagonists in Cancer Treatment
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 13, 2008;
358(11):
1160 - 1174.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Giusti, K. Shastri, A. M. Pilaro, C. Fuchs, R. Cordoba-Rodriguez, K. Koti, M. Rothmann, A. Y. Men, H. Zhao, M. Hughes, et al.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Panitumumab for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma with Progression Following Fluoropyrimidine-, Oxaliplatin-, and Irinotecan-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2008;
14(5):
1296 - 1302.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Toma and P. J. Medina
Update on Targeted Therapy--Focus on Monoclonal Antibodies
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
February 1, 2008;
21(1):
4 - 16.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Weiner, A. S. Belldegrun, J. Crawford, A. W. Tolcher, P. Lockbaum, R. H. Arends, L. Navale, R. G. Amado, G. Schwab, and R. A. Figlin
Dose and Schedule Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2008;
14(2):
502 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Van Cutsem, S. Siena, Y. Humblet, J.-L. Canon, J. Maurel, E. Bajetta, B. Neyns, D. Kotasek, A. Santoro, W. Scheithauer, et al.
An open-label, single-arm study assessing safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2008;
19(1):
92 - 98.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Jonker, C. J. O'Callaghan, C. S. Karapetis, J. R. Zalcberg, D. Tu, H.-J. Au, S. R. Berry, M. Krahn, T. Price, R. J. Simes, et al.
Cetuximab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 15, 2007;
357(20):
2040 - 2048.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grothey
Biological Therapy and Other Novel Therapies in Early-Stage Disease: Are They Appropriate?
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2007;
13(22):
6909s - 6912s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ferrari and P. Foa
Targeted Therapies: Cui Prodest?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2007;
25(29):
4691 - 4692.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Baselga and J. Tabernero
Combined Antiangiogenesis and Antiepidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting in the Treatment of Cancer: Hold Back, We Are Not There Yet
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2007;
25(29):
4516 - 4518.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Strome, E. A. Sausville, and D. Mann
A Mechanistic Perspective of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy Beyond Target-Related Effects
Oncologist,
September 1, 2007;
12(9):
1084 - 1095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sartore-Bianchi, M. Moroni, S. Veronese, C. Carnaghi, E. Bajetta, G. Luppi, A. Sobrero, C. Barone, S. Cascinu, G. Colucci, et al.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Copy Number and Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Panitumumab
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2007;
25(22):
3238 - 3245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Hoff and L. M. Ellis
Targeted Therapy Trials: Approval Strategies, Target Validation, or Helping Patients?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2007;
25(13):
1639 - 1641.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|