This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wisnivesky, J. P. Articles by Halm, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wisnivesky, J. P. Articles by Halm, E. A.

Sex Differences in Lung Cancer Survival: Do Tumors Behave Differently in Elderly Women?

Juan P. Wisnivesky, Ethan A. Halm

From the Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine; and the Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Address reprint requests to Juan P. Wisnivesky, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, Box 1087, New York, NY 10029; e-mail: juan.wisnivesky{at}mssm.edu

Purpose: Women with lung cancer appear to have better survival. Whether this results from better response to treatment, different tumor biology, or a longer life expectancy is not well understood. This study sought to assess sex differences in the natural history of lung cancer after controlling for unrelated causes of death and type of treatment.

Methods: This study included 18,967 elderly patients with stage I and II non–small-cell lung cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare records. Patients were grouped into three categories according to the treatment received: surgery, radiation or chemotherapy but no surgery, and untreated cases. We used stratified and multivariate analyses to evaluate sex differences in survival using three methods to control for competing risks: lung cancer–specific survival, overall survival adjusting for comorbidities, and relative survival. Sensitivity analysis was used to test whether potential differences in smoking could account for the observed association of sex with survival.

Results: Women in all treatment groups had better lung cancer–specific, overall, and relative survival than did men (P < .0001). Stratified and multivariate analyses showed that women had better survival than did men after controlling for confounders. Sensitivity analyses showed that potential sex differences in smoking did not explain our findings.

Conclusion: In this national, population-based sample, elderly women with early lung cancer had better risk-adjusted survival regardless of the type of treatment. That sex differences were observed among untreated patients suggests that lung cancer in women may have a different natural history.

Supported by Grant No. K08 HS013312 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (J.P.W.).

Presented in abstract form at the 71st Annual Meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians, October 29–November 3, 2005, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Heiss, R. Wallace, G. L. Anderson, A. Aragaki, S. A. A. Beresford, R. Brzyski, R. T. Chlebowski, M. Gass, A. LaCroix, J. E. Manson, et al. Health Risks and Benefits 3 Years After Stopping Randomized Treatment With Estrogen and Progestin JAMA, March 5, 2008; 299(9): 1036 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]