Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2509 on May 7 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 17 (June 10), 2007: pp. 2434-2441
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Prospective, Randomized Study of Single Compared With Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Bologna 96 Clinical Study
Michele Cavo,
Patrizia Tosi,
Elena Zamagni,
Claudia Cellini,
Paola Tacchetti,
Francesca Patriarca,
Francesco Di Raimondo,
Ettore Volpe,
Sonia Ronconi,
Delia Cangini,
Franco Narni,
Affra Carubelli,
Luciano Masini,
Lucio Catalano,
Mauro Fiacchini,
Antonio de Vivo,
Alessandro Gozzetti,
Antonio Lazzaro,
Sante Tura,
Michele Baccarani
From the Istituto di Ematologia ed Oncologia Medica [Seràgnoli], Università di Bologna, Bologna; Clinica Ematologia, Università di Udine, Udine; Cattedra di Ematologia, Università di Catania, Catania; Servizio di Ematologia, Avellino; Sezione di Ematologia, Università di Modena, Modena; Unità Operativa di Ematologia, Cagliari; Servizio di Ematologia, Reggio Emilia; Divisione di Ematologia, Università Federico II, Napoli; Divisione di Ematologia e Trapianti, Università di Siena, Siena; and Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia, Piacenza
Address reprint requests to Michele Cavo, MD, [Seràgnoli] Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology, via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy; e-mail: mcavo{at}med.unibo.it
Purpose We performed a prospective, randomized study of single (arm A) versus double (arm B) autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).
Patients and Methods A total of 321 patients were enrolled onto the study and were randomly assigned to receive either a single course of high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 (arm A) or melphalan at 200 mg/m2 followed, after 3 to 6 months, by melphalan at 120 mg/m2 and busulfan at 12 mg/kilogram (arm B).
Results As compared with assignment to the single-transplantation group (n = 163 patients), random assignment to receive double ASCT (n = 158 patients) significantly increased the probability to attain at least a near complete response (nCR; 33% v 47%, respectively; P = .008), prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) duration of 18 months (median, 24 v 42 months, respectively; P < .001), and significantly extended event-free survival (EFS; median, 23 v 35 months, respectively; P = .001). Administration of a second transplantation and of novel agents for treating sequential relapses in up to 50% of patients randomly assigned to receive a single ASCT likely contributed to prolong the survival duration of the whole group, whose 7-year rate (46%) was similar to that of the double-transplantation group (43%; P = .90). Transplantation-related mortality was 3% in arm A and 4% in arm B (P = .70).
Conclusion In comparison with a single ASCT as up-front therapy for newly diagnosed MM, double ASCT effected superior CR or nCR rate, RFS, and EFS, but failed to significantly prolong overall survival. Benefits offered by double ASCT were particularly evident among patients who failed at least nCR after one autotransplantation.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on May 7, 2007.
Supported by Università di Bologna, Progetti di Ricerca Fondamentale Orientata (M.C.); Ministero dell'Università e Ricerca Scientifica, progetto FIRB, RBAU012E9A_001 (M.C.); and Fondazione Carisbo.
Presented in part at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, December 6-9, 2004, San Diego, CA.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. Mehta
Re: Tandem vs Single Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 21, 2009;
101(20):
1430 - 1431.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cavo, F. Di Raimondo, E. Zamagni, F. Patriarca, P. Tacchetti, A. F. Casulli, S. Volpe, G. Perrone, A. Ledda, M. Ceccolini, et al.
Short-Term Thalidomide Incorporated Into Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Comparison With Double Autotransplantation for Multiple Myeloma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2009;
27(30):
5001 - 5007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-L. Harousseau, M. Attal, and H. Avet-Loiseau
The role of complete response in multiple myeloma
Blood,
October 8, 2009;
114(15):
3139 - 3146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Giarin, L. Giaccone, R. Sorasio, C. Sfiligoi, B. Amoroso, F. Cavallo, A. Cipriani, A. Palumbo, and M. Boccadoro
Serum Free Light Chain Ratio, Total {kappa}/{lambda} Ratio, and Immunofixation Results Are Not Prognostic Factors after Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Clin. Chem.,
August 1, 2009;
55(8):
1510 - 1516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kumar and B. Djulbegovic
Response: Re: Tandem vs Single Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
July 1, 2009;
101(13):
966 - 967.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-L. Harousseau and P. Moreau
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
N. Engl. J. Med.,
June 18, 2009;
360(25):
2645 - 2654.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rotta, B. E. Storer, F. Sahebi, J. A. Shizuru, B. Bruno, T. Lange, E. D. Agura, P. A. McSweeney, M. A. Pulsipher, P. Hari, et al.
Long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and nonmyeloablative allografting
Blood,
April 2, 2009;
113(14):
3383 - 3391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kumar, M. A. Kharfan-Dabaja, A. Glasmacher, and B. Djulbegovic
Tandem Versus Single Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 21, 2009;
101(2):
100 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Moreau, F. Garban, M. Attal, M. Michallet, G. Marit, C. Hulin, L. Benboubker, C. Doyen, M. Mohty, I. Yakoub-Agha, et al.
Long-term follow-up results of IFM99-03 and IFM99-04 trials comparing nonmyeloablative allotransplantation with autologous transplantation in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma
Blood,
November 1, 2008;
112(9):
3914 - 3915.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Rosinol, J. A. Perez-Simon, A. Sureda, J. de la Rubia, F. de Arriba, J. J. Lahuerta, J. D. Gonzalez, J. Diaz-Mediavilla, B. Hernandez, J. Garcia-Frade, et al.
A prospective PETHEMA study of tandem autologous transplantation versus autograft followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
Blood,
November 1, 2008;
112(9):
3591 - 3593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. V. Rajkumar
Treatment of Myeloma: Cure vs Control
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
October 1, 2008;
83(10):
1142 - 1145.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. San-Miguel, J.-L. Harousseau, D. Joshua, and K. C. Anderson
Individualizing Treatment of Patients With Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2008;
26(16):
2761 - 2766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Lazarus, G. L. Phillips, R. H. Herzig, D. D. Hurd, S. N. Wolff, and G. P. Herzig
High-Dose Melphalan and the Development of Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: 25 Years Later
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2008;
26(14):
2240 - 2243.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Mehta
One or two autografts for myeloma?
Blood,
April 1, 2008;
111(7):
3899 - 3900.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Jagannath
Is tandem autotransplantation necessary in myeloma?
Blood,
February 15, 2008;
111(4):
1751 - 1752.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Abdelkefi, S. Ladeb, L. Torjman, T. B. Othman, A. Lakhal, N. B. Romdhane, H. E. Omri, M. Elloumi, H. Belaaj, R. Jeddi, et al.
Single autologous stem-cell transplantation followed by maintenance therapy with thalidomide is superior to double autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial
Blood,
February 15, 2008;
111(4):
1805 - 1810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Bensinger
Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Drugs
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2008;
26(3):
480 - 492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-L. Harousseau
Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
Hematology,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
306 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. V. Rajkumar and S. R. Hayman
Controversies Surrounding the Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
369 - 374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Dingli, J. M. Pacheco, G. S. Nowakowski, S. K. Kumar, A. Dispenzieri, S. R. Hayman, M. Q. Lacy, D. A. Gastineau, and M. A. Gertz
Relationship Between Depth of Response and Outcome in Multiple Myeloma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2007;
25(31):
4933 - 4937.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Katzel, P. Hari, and D. H. Vesole
Multiple Myeloma: Charging Toward a Bright Future
CA Cancer J Clin,
September 1, 2007;
57(5):
301 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Attal, P. Moreau, H. Avet-Loiseau, and J.-L. Harousseau
Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
Hematology,
January 1, 2007;
2007(1):
311 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
