|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1604 on May 7 2007 © 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Evaluation of Cognitive Function Associated With Chemotherapy: A Review of Published Studies and Recommendations for Future Research
From the Princess Margaret Hospital; and St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Address reprint requests to Ian Tannock, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; e-mail: Ian.Tannock{at}uhn.on.ca Purpose There is evidence that some cancer survivors suffer cognitive impairment after chemotherapy. Determining if a patient has cognitive impairment is challenging, especially because impairment is usually subtle. Patients and Methods We assessed the design of studies evaluating cognitive function during or after chemotherapy in adult patients with solid tumors. We also reviewed methods used to evaluate cognitive function in subjects with other diseases and make recommendations for future studies. Results We identified 22 studies that met our criteria: 82% included women with breast cancer. Eight studies were longitudinal, 12 were cross-sectional, and two were follow-ups of cross-sectional studies. Sixteen studies used a battery of neuropsychological (NP) tests to assess subjects, and 13 included a control group. Ten studies (45%) had no explicit definition of cognitive impairment; most others used z scores or T scores and defined impairment based on standard deviations below the mean, but there was no consistency in for the cutoff point used or the number of tests required. Conclusion There is no consistency in defining cognitive impairment, in the NP batteries used, or in statistical methods in studies of cognitive function of cancer patients. We suggest guidelines to define criteria for cognitive impairment. Use of summary scores and control groups is recommended. Practice effect should be adjusted for in longitudinal studies. A balance is needed between comprehensive batteries and briefer tests, which still need to be sensitive to mild impairment. published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on May 7, 2007. Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Susan G. Komen Foundation, and by an ASCO Young Investigator Award (J.V.). Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|