Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9572 on June 4 2007

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 21 (July 20), 2007: pp. 3001-3006
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lash, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Silliman, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lash, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Silliman, R. A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial

Mammography Surveillance and Mortality in Older Breast Cancer Survivors

Timothy L. Lash, Matthew P. Fox, Diana S.M. Buist, Feifei Wei, Terry S. Field, Floyd J. Frost, Ann M. Geiger, Virginia P. Quinn, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Rebecca A. Silliman

From the Departments of Epidemiology and International Health, Boston University School of Public Health; Geriatrics Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; Fallon Community Health Plan, Worcester, MA; Group Health Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA; HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN; Lovelace Health Systems, Albuquerque, NM; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Address reprint requests to Timothy L. Lash, DSc, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, TE3, Boston, MA 02118; e-mail: tlash{at}bu.edu

Purpose: There are more than 2,000,000 breast cancer survivors in the United States today. While surveillance for asymptomatic recurrence and second primary is included in consensus recommendations, the effectiveness of this surveillance has not been well characterized. Our purpose is to estimate the effectiveness of surveillance mammography in a cohort of breast cancer survivors with complete ascertainment of surveillance mammograms and negligible losses to follow-up.

Patients and Methods: We enrolled 1,846 stage I and II breast cancer patients who were at least 65 years old at six integrated health care delivery systems. We used medical record review and existing databases to ascertain patient, tumor, and therapy characteristics, as well as receipt of surveillance mammograms. We linked personal identifiers to the National Death Index to ascertain date and cause of death. We matched four controls to each breast cancer decedent to estimate the association between receipt of surveillance mammogram and breast cancer mortality.

Results: One hundred seventy-eight women died of breast cancer during 5 years of follow-up. Each additional surveillance mammogram was associated with a 0.69-fold decrease in the odds of breast cancer mortality (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.92). The protective association was strongest among women with stage I disease, those who received mastectomy, and those in the oldest age group.

Conclusion: Given existing recommendations for post-therapy surveillance, trials to compare surveillance with no surveillance are unlikely. This large observational study provides support for the recommendations, suggesting that receipt of surveillance mammograms reduces the rate of breast cancer mortality in older patients diagnosed with early-stage disease.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on June 4, 2007.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Related Editorial

  • To Screen or Not to Screen Older Women for Breast Cancer: A New Twist on an Old Question or Will We Ever Invest in Getting the Answers?
    Jeanne Mandelblatt
    JCO 2007 25: 2991-2992 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
B. A. Williams, K. Lindquist, R. L. Sudore, K. E. Covinsky, and L. C. Walter
Screening Mammography in Older Women: Effect of Wealth and Prognosis
Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 514 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Mandelblatt
To Screen or Not to Screen Older Women for Breast Cancer: A New Twist on an Old Question or Will We Ever Invest in Getting the Answers?
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 2991 - 2992.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online