|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 21 (July 20), 2007: pp. 3055-3060 © 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6210 Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Erlotinib for Solid Tumors in Patients With Hepatic or Renal Dysfunction: CALGB 60101
From the Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Iowa College of Pharmacy; University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, IA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; and North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset, NY Address reprint requests to Antonius A. Miller, MD, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1082; e-mail: aamiller{at}wfubmc.edu Purpose We investigated dose and pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in patients with hepatic dysfunction or renal dysfunction.
Patients and Methods Patients were assigned to one of three cohorts: cohort 1, AST
Results Between December 2001 and May 2005, 55 patients were accrued. The distribution of assessable patients was: two of three in cohort 1, three of three in cohort 1a, 16 of 30 in cohort 2, and 18 of 18 in cohort 3. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of elevation of both total and direct bilirubin Conclusion Patients with renal dysfunction tolerate 150 mg of erlotinib daily and seem to have an erlotinib clearance similar to patients without organ dysfunction. Patients with hepatic dysfunction should be treated at a reduced dose (ie, 75 mg daily) consistent with their reduced clearance. Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA 03927, CA 47642, CA 33601, CA 47577, CA 04326, CA 41287, CA 77597, CA 77658, CA 31983, CA 47642, CA 35279, and CA 31946. Presented in part at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 2-6, 2006, Atlanta, GA. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|