Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 21 (July 20), 2007: pp. 3151-3157
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6958

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sexual Well-Being Among Partnered Women With Breast Cancer Recurrence

Barbara L. Andersen, Kristen M. Carpenter, Hae-Chung Yang, Charles L. Shapiro

From the Departments of Psychology and Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Medicine, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Address reprint requests to Barbara L. Andersen, PhD, 149 Psychology Building, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail: Andersen.1{at}osu.edu

Purpose A woman's risk for sexual disruption after breast cancer recurrence has received little clinical or research attention.

Patients and Methods Breast cancer patients recently diagnosed with recurrence (n = 60) were initially assessed at baseline and completed follow-ups at 4, 8, and 12 months. They were compared by age, stage, and duration and frequency of follow-up with matched patients who remained disease free (n = 120). Using linear mixed modeling, the groups were compared in their trajectories of change on measures of sexuality, relationship satisfaction, cancer-specific stress, and physical functioning. Recurrence subgroups, those with locoregional versus distant disease and those younger versus older than 52 years, were also compared.

Results At baseline, the recurrence group had significantly lower intercourse frequency and physical functioning compared with the disease-free group and these differences were maintained. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of kissing or sexual and relationship satisfactions. For the recurrence group patients, the heightened stress of the diagnostic/early recurrence treatment period declined to the lower disease-free levels by 12 months. This effect was largely due to improvement of the patients with distant disease. Finally, sexual changes were most notable for younger patients.

Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal, controlled study of sexuality—sexuality in the context of other quality of life domains—for women coping with recurrence. Despite disruption, patients maintained their sexual lives. Younger and distant recurrence patients, however, may have greatest risk of sexual disruption. The factors contributing to sexual disruption remain unknown, and studies investigating strategies to help patients maintain this aspect of quality of life are needed.

Supported in part by the American Cancer Society Grants No. PBR-89 and RSGPB-03-248-01-PBP; Longaberger Company-American Cancer Society Grant No. PBR-89A for Breast Cancer Research; the Walther Cancer Institute; the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Grants No. DAMD17-94-J-4165, DAMD17-96-1-6294, and DAMD17-97-1-7062; National Institutes of Mental Health Grant No. 1 RO1 MH51487; the National Cancer Institute Grants No. KO5 CA098133 and RO1 CA92704; the General Clinical Research Center Grant No. MO1-RR0034; and the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Grant No. P30 CA16058.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Hickey, M. Peate, C.M. Saunders, and M. Friedlander
Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 323 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. R. Schover
Premature Ovarian Failure and Its Consequences: Vasomotor Symptoms, Sexuality, and Fertility
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 753 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online