Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0784 on July 2 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 23 (August 10), 2007: pp. 3421-3427
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Phase II Trial of Ixabepilone, an Epothilone B Analog, in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Untreated With Taxanes
Neelima Denduluri,
Jennifer A. Low,
James J. Lee,
Arlene W. Berman,
Janice M. Walshe,
Ujala Vatas,
Catherine K. Chow,
Seth M. Steinberg,
Sherry X. Yang,
Sandra M. Swain
From the Breast Cancer Section, Medical Oncology Branch and Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Office of the Clinical Director, Center for Cancer Research; Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis; Diagnostic Radiology Department, Warrant G. Magnuson Clinical Center; National Clinical Target Validation Laboratory, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Bethesda, MD; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Address reprint requests to Sandra M. Swain, MD, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010; e-mail: sandra.m.swain{at}medstar.net
Purpose Ixabepilone is an epothilone B analog that binds to microtubules and results in microtubule stabilization and mitotic arrest. Ixabepilone was evaluated for efficacy and safety in a phase II clinical trial for women with metastatic breast cancer.
Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if they had not previously received treatment with a taxane and had measurable metastatic breast cancer. Ixabepilone was administered at 6 mg/m2/d intravenously days 1 through 5 every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients underwent pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsies, and tissues were analyzed for acetylated -tubulin, tau-1, and p53 expression when possible.
Results Twenty-three patients received 210 cycles with a median of eight cycles (range, two to 22 cycles) per patient. Thirteen patients (57%; exact 95% CI, 34.5% to 76.8%) had partial responses, six patients (26%) had stable disease, and four patients (17%) had progressive disease. Median time to progression and duration of response were 5.5 and 5.6 months, respectively. Four patients required dose reductions for neutropenia, neuropathy, or fatigue. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (22%), fatigue (13%), anorexia (9%), and motor neuropathy (4%). Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced grade 1, 13% experienced grade 2, and none experienced grade 3/4 sensory neuropathy. The six patients with paired biopsies all had increases in tumor -tubulin acetylation after treatment. Baseline or cycle 2 acetylated -tubulin, tau-1, or p53 expression did not correlate with clinical response.
Conclusion Women with metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with taxanes have a meaningful durable response to single-agent ixabepilone therapy. Minimal hematologic toxicity and no grade 3 sensory neuropathy were noted.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on July 2, 2007.
Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Presented in part at the 41st and 42nd Annual Meetings of the America Society of Clinical Oncology, May 13-17, 2005, Orlando, FL, and June 2-6, 2006, Atlanta, GA, respectively.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Ixabepilone and the Narrow Path to Developing New Cytotoxic Drugs
Luca Gianni
JCO 2007 25: 3389-3391
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Michaud
The Epothilones: How Pharmacology Relates to Clinical Utility
Ann. Pharmacother.,
July 1, 2009;
43(7):
1294 - 1309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Rosenberg, C. J. Ryan, V. K. Weinberg, D. C. Smith, M. Hussain, T. M. Beer, C. W. Ryan, P. Mathew, L. C. Pagliaro, A. L. Harzstark, et al.
Phase I Study of Ixabepilone, Mitoxantrone, and Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel-Based Therapy: A Study of the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 10, 2009;
27(17):
2772 - 2778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Boehnke Michaud
The optimal therapeutic use of ixabepilone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
June 1, 2009;
15(2):
95 - 106.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Moreno-Aspitia and E. A. Perez
Treatment Options for Breast Cancer Resistant to Anthracycline and Taxane
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
June 1, 2009;
84(6):
533 - 545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Yardley
Proactive Management of Adverse Events Maintains the Clinical Benefit of Ixabepilone
Oncologist,
May 1, 2009;
14(5):
448 - 455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. C. Widemann, W. Goodspeed, A. Goodwin, T. Fojo, F. M. Balis, and E. Fox
Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Ixabepilone Administered Daily for 5 Days in Children and Adolescents With Refractory Solid Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2009;
27(4):
550 - 556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dumontet, M. A. Jordan, and F. F.Y. Lee
Ixabepilone: targeting {beta}III-tubulin expression in taxane-resistant malignancies
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2009;
8(1):
17 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goel, G. L. Goldberg, D. Y.-S. Kuo, F. Muggia, J. Arezzo, and S. Mani
Novel neurosensory testing in cancer patients treated with the epothilone B analog, ixabepilone
Ann. Onc.,
December 1, 2008;
19(12):
2048 - 2052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Rivera, J. Lee, and A. Davies
Clinical Development of Ixabepilone and Other Epothilones in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Oncologist,
December 1, 2008;
13(12):
1207 - 1223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Morris and M. N. Fornier
Microtubule Active Agents: Beyond the Taxane Frontier
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2008;
14(22):
7167 - 7172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goodin
Ixabepilone: A novel microtubule-stabilizing agent for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.,
November 1, 2008;
65(21):
2017 - 2026.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Tan and D. L. Toppmeyer
Ixabepilone in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Complement or Alternative to Taxanes?
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2008;
14(21):
6725 - 6729.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bhushan and C. M Walko
Ixabepilone: A New Antimitotic for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Ann. Pharmacother.,
September 1, 2008;
42(9):
1252 - 1261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain
The Epothilones: Translating from the Laboratory to the Clinic
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2008;
14(6):
1618 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Vahdat
Ixabepilone: A Novel Antineoplastic Agent with Low Susceptibility to Multiple Tumor Resistance Mechanisms
Oncologist,
March 1, 2008;
13(3):
214 - 221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
The Epothilones Are Coming!
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology,
August 28, 2007;
2007(828):
1 - 1.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gianni
Ixabepilone and the Narrow Path to Developing New Cytotoxic Drugs
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3389 - 3391.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|