Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 24 (August 20), 2007: pp. 3621-3627
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517
Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
William E. Winter, III,
G. Larry Maxwell,
Chunqiao Tian,
Jay W. Carlson,
Robert F. Ozols,
Peter G. Rose,
Maurie Markman,
Deborah K. Armstrong,
Franco Muggia,
William P. McGuire
From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft Sam; Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson, Houston, TX; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Departments of Medicine and Medical Oncology, Kaplan Cancer, Center, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Gynecologic Oncology of West Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI; Medical Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Case Western Reserve University; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Oncology, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center; and the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, MD
Address reprint requests to G. Larry Maxwell, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307; e-mail: george.maxwell{at}na.amedd.army.mil
Purpose Conflicting results on prognostic factors for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been reported because of small sample size and heterogeneity of study population. The purpose of this study was to identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with advanced EOC.
Patients and Methods A retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data from 1,895 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III EOC who had undergone primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was conducted. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results Increasing age was associated with increased risks for disease progression (HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11 for an increase every 10 years) and death (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18). Mucinous or clear-cell histology was associated with a worse PFS and OS compared with serous carcinomas. Patients with performance status (PS) 1 or 2 were at an increased risk for recurrence compared with PS 0 (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24). Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and > 1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.70 to 2.26; and HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 2.04 to 2.73, respectively) and death (HR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.78 to 2.49; P < .001; and HR = 2.47; 95% CI, 2.09 to 2.92, respectively).
Conclusion Age, PS, tumor histology, and residual tumor volume were independent predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III EOC. These data can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis and to design future tailored randomized clinical trials.
Supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group administrative office (CA 27469) and statistical office (CA 37517).
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Onda, H. Yoshikawa, T. Yasugi, K. Matsumoto, and Y. Taketani
The Optimal Debulking after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Proposal based on Interval Look During Upfront Surgery Setting Treatment
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2009;
(2009)
hyp127v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mabuchi, C. Kawase, D. A. Altomare, K. Morishige, K. Sawada, M. Hayashi, M. Tsujimoto, M. Yamoto, A. J. Klein-Szanto, R. J. Schilder, et al.
mTOR Is a Promising Therapeutic Target Both in Cisplatin-Sensitive and Cisplatin-Resistant Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2009;
15(17):
5404 - 5413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bagnoli, F. Ambrogi, S. Pilotti, P. Alberti, A. Ditto, M. Barbareschi, E. Galligioni, E. Biganzoli, S. Canevari, and D. Mezzanzanica
c-FLIPL expression defines two ovarian cancer patient subsets and is a prognostic factor of adverse outcome
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2009;
16(2):
443 - 453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. PECTASIDES, G. PAPAXOINIS, G. FOUNTZILAS, G. ARAVANTINOS, A. BAMIAS, N. PAVLIDIS, H.P. KALOFONOS, E. TIMOTHEADOU, E. SAMANTAS, E. BRIASOULIS, et al.
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Greece: A Retrospective Study of 1,791 Patients by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)
Anticancer Res,
February 1, 2009;
29(2):
745 - 751.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S.P. Tan, C. Rothermundt, K. Thomas, E. Bancroft, R. Eeles, S. Shanley, A. Ardern-Jones, A. Norman, S. B. Kaye, and M. E. Gore
"BRCAness" Syndrome in Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study Describing the Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2008;
26(34):
5530 - 5536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Krivak, K. M. Darcy, C. Tian, D. Armstrong, B. E. Baysal, H. Gallion, C. B. Ambrosone, and J. A. DeLoia
Relationship Between ERCC1 Polymorphisms, Disease Progression, and Survival in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Intraperitoneal Versus Intravenous Cisplatin and Paclitaxel for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2008;
26(21):
3598 - 3606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. E. Winter III, G. L. Maxwell, C. Tian, M. J. Sundborg, G. S. Rose, P. G. Rose, S. C. Rubin, F. Muggia, and W. P. McGuire
Tumor Residual After Surgical Cytoreduction in Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2008;
26(1):
83 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Teramukai, H. Tada, M. Fukushima, and K. Ochiai
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2007;
25(35):
5670 - 5671.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology,
September 18, 2007;
2007(918):
3 - 3.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|