Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228 on May 7 2007

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 24 (August 20), 2007: pp. 3664-3669
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Avigdor, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Avigdor, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prospective Multicentric Randomized Study Comparing Periareolar and Peritumoral Injection of Radiotracer and Blue Dye for the Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Sparing Procedures: FRANSENODE Trial

Jean-François Rodier, Michel Velten, Marc Wilt, Pierre Martel, Gwanaël Ferron, Véronique Vaini-Elies, Hervé Mignotte, Alain Brémond, Jean-Marc Classe, François Dravet, Thierry Routiot, Christine Tunon de Lara, Antoine Avril, Gérard Lorimier, Eric Fondrinier, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Sandrine Avigdor

From the French Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Strasbourg, Toulouse, Lyon, Nantes, Bordeaux, Angers, and Marseille; Axium Clinic of Aix en Provence; Community Hospital of Le Mans; and the Community Hospital of Orléans, Orléans, France

Address reprint requests to Jean-François Rodier, MD, FACS, Department of Surgical Oncology, Paul Strauss Cancer Center, 3 rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, BP 42 F-67065 Strasbourg Cedex, France; e-mail: jrodier{at}strasbourg.fnclcc.fr

Purpose To determine the optimal injection path for blue dye and radiocolloid for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in early breast cancer.

Patients and Methods A prospective randomized multicentric study was initiated to compare the peritumoral (PT) injection site to the periareolar (PA) site in 449 patients.

Results The detection rate of axillary SLN by lymphoscintigraphy was significantly higher (P = .03) in the PA group (85.2%) than in the PT group (73.2%). Intraoperative detection rate by blue dye and/or gamma probe was similar (99.11%) in both groups. The rate of SLN detection was somewhat higher in the PA group than in the PT group: 95.6% versus 93.8% with blue dye (P = .24) and 98.2% versus 96.0% by probe (P = .16), respectively. The number of SLNs detected by lymphoscintigraphy and by probe was significantly higher in the PA group than in the PT group, 1.5 versus 1.2 (P = .001) and 1.9 versus 1.7 (P = .02). The blue and hot concordance was 95.6% in the PA group and 91.5% in the PT group (P = .08). The mean ex vivo count of the SLN was significantly higher in the PA group than in the PT group (P < .0001).

Conclusion This study strongly validates the PA injection technique given the high detection rate (99.1%) of SLN and the high concordance (95.6%) between blue dye and the radiotracer, as well as higher significant ex and in vivo counts, improving SLN probe detection.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on July 23, 2007.

Supported by grants from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer and the Féderation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

Presented at the 4th Annual International Sentinel Node Congress, December 3-6, 2004, Los Angeles, CA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Articles

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Plus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Compared With SLND Alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011
    Anthony Lucci, Linda Mackie McCall, Peter D. Beitsch, Patrick W. Whitworth, Douglas S. Reintgen, Peter W. Blumencranz, A. Marilyn Leitch, Sukumal Saha, Kelly K. Hunt, and Armando E. Giuliano
    JCO 2007 25: 3657-3663 [Abstract] [Full Text]
  • Doctor, What Are My Chances of Having a Positive Sentinel Node? A Validated Nomogram for Risk Estimation
    José Luiz B. Bevilacqua, Michael W. Kattan, Jane V. Fey, Hiram S. Cody, III, Patrick I. Borgen, and Kimberly J. Van Zee
    JCO 2007 25: 3670-3679 [Abstract] [Full Text]




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online