Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823 on September 4 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 28 (October 1), 2007: pp. 4414-4422
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Measurement of Residual Breast Cancer Burden to Predict Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
W. Fraser Symmans,
Florentia Peintinger,
Christos Hatzis,
Radhika Rajan,
Henry Kuerer,
Vicente Valero,
Lina Assad,
Anna Poniecka,
Bryan Hennessy,
Marjorie Green,
Aman U. Buzdar,
S. Eva Singletary,
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi,
Lajos Pusztai
From the Departments of Pathology, Surgery, and Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Nuvera Biosciences Inc, Woburn, MA
Address reprint requests to W. Fraser Symmans, MD, Department of Pathology, Unit 85, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030-4009; e-mail: fsymmans{at}mdanderson.org
Purpose: To measure residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to improve the prognostic information that can be obtained from evaluating pathologic response.
Patients and Methods: Pathologic slides and reports were reviewed from 382 patients in two different treatment cohorts: sequential paclitaxel (T) then fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in 241 patients; and a single regimen of FAC in 141 patients. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated as a continuous index combining pathologic measurements of primary tumor (size and cellularity) and nodal metastases (number and size) for prediction of distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in multivariate Cox regression analyses.
Results: RCB was independently prognostic in a multivariate model that included age, pretreatment clinical stage, hormone receptor status, hormone therapy, and pathologic response (pathologic complete response [pCR] v residual disease [RD]; hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.69; P < .001). Minimal RD (RCB-I) in 17% of patients carried the same prognosis as pCR (RCB-0). Extensive RD (RCB-III) in 13% of patients was associated with poor prognosis, regardless of hormone receptor status, adjuvant hormone therapy, or pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of residual disease. The generalizability of RCB for prognosis of distant relapse was confirmed in the FAC-treated validation cohort.
Conclusion: RCB determined from routine pathologic materials represented the distribution of RD, was a significant predictor of DRFS, and can be used to define categories of near-complete response and chemotherapy resistance.
Published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on September 4, 2007.
Supported by a research Grant No. DAMD17-02-1-0458 01 from Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (W.F.S.) and the Nellie B. Connally Breast Cancer Research Fund.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Related Correspondence
- Measurement of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Catherine Abrial, Emilie Thivat, Olivier Tacca, Xavier Durando, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Pierre Gimbergues, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, and Philippe Chollet
JCO 2008 26: 3094
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Jeruss, E. A. Mittendorf, S. L. Tucker, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, T. A. Buchholz, A. A. Sahin, J. N. Cormier, A. U. Buzdar, G. N. Hortobagyi, and K. K. Hunt
Staging of Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Setting
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2008;
68(16):
6477 - 6481.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Peintinger, A. U. Buzdar, H. M. Kuerer, J. A. Mejia, C. Hatzis, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, L. Pusztai, F. J. Esteva, S. S. Dawood, M. C. Green, et al.
Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab
Ann. Onc.,
July 29, 2008;
(2008)
mdn427v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Grube, C. J. Christy, D. Black, M. Martel, L. Harris, J. Weidhaas, M. P. DiGiovanna, G. Chung, M. M. Abu-Khalaf, K. D. Miller, et al.
Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Before Preoperative Chemotherapy
Arch Surg,
July 1, 2008;
143(7):
692 - 700.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Abrial, E. Thivat, O. Tacca, X. Durando, M.-A. Mouret-Reynier, P. Gimbergues, F. Penault-Llorca, and P. Chollet
Measurement of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2008;
26(18):
3094 - 3094.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. F. Symmans
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2008;
26(18):
3095 - 3095.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Mehta and T. Schubbert
Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst,
May 7, 2008;
100(9):
680 - 680.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Esteva and G. N. Hortobagyi
Can Early Response Assessment Guide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst,
April 16, 2008;
100(8):
521 - 523.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al.
Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
806 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Gralow, H. J. Burstein, W. Wood, G. N. Hortobagyi, L. Gianni, G. von Minckwitz, A. U. Buzdar, I. E. Smith, W. F. Symmans, B. Singh, et al.
Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
814 - 819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. C. Ellis
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
55 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|