Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823 on September 4 2007

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 28 (October 1), 2007: pp. 4414-4422
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Symmans, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Symmans, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

Measurement of Residual Breast Cancer Burden to Predict Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

W. Fraser Symmans, Florentia Peintinger, Christos Hatzis, Radhika Rajan, Henry Kuerer, Vicente Valero, Lina Assad, Anna Poniecka, Bryan Hennessy, Marjorie Green, Aman U. Buzdar, S. Eva Singletary, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai

From the Departments of Pathology, Surgery, and Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Nuvera Biosciences Inc, Woburn, MA

Address reprint requests to W. Fraser Symmans, MD, Department of Pathology, Unit 85, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030-4009; e-mail: fsymmans{at}mdanderson.org

Purpose: To measure residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to improve the prognostic information that can be obtained from evaluating pathologic response.

Patients and Methods: Pathologic slides and reports were reviewed from 382 patients in two different treatment cohorts: sequential paclitaxel (T) then fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in 241 patients; and a single regimen of FAC in 141 patients. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated as a continuous index combining pathologic measurements of primary tumor (size and cellularity) and nodal metastases (number and size) for prediction of distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results: RCB was independently prognostic in a multivariate model that included age, pretreatment clinical stage, hormone receptor status, hormone therapy, and pathologic response (pathologic complete response [pCR] v residual disease [RD]; hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.69; P < .001). Minimal RD (RCB-I) in 17% of patients carried the same prognosis as pCR (RCB-0). Extensive RD (RCB-III) in 13% of patients was associated with poor prognosis, regardless of hormone receptor status, adjuvant hormone therapy, or pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of residual disease. The generalizability of RCB for prognosis of distant relapse was confirmed in the FAC-treated validation cohort.

Conclusion: RCB determined from routine pathologic materials represented the distribution of RD, was a significant predictor of DRFS, and can be used to define categories of near-complete response and chemotherapy resistance.

Published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on September 4, 2007.

Supported by a research Grant No. DAMD17-02-1-0458 01 from Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (W.F.S.) and the Nellie B. Connally Breast Cancer Research Fund.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Related Correspondence

  • Measurement of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Catherine Abrial, Emilie Thivat, Olivier Tacca, Xavier Durando, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Pierre Gimbergues, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, and Philippe Chollet
    JCO 2008 26: 3094 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. S. Jeruss, E. A. Mittendorf, S. L. Tucker, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, T. A. Buchholz, A. A. Sahin, J. N. Cormier, A. U. Buzdar, G. N. Hortobagyi, and K. K. Hunt
Staging of Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Setting
Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6477 - 6481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F. Peintinger, A. U. Buzdar, H. M. Kuerer, J. A. Mejia, C. Hatzis, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, L. Pusztai, F. J. Esteva, S. S. Dawood, M. C. Green, et al.
Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab
Ann. Onc., July 29, 2008; (2008) mdn427v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
B. J. Grube, C. J. Christy, D. Black, M. Martel, L. Harris, J. Weidhaas, M. P. DiGiovanna, G. Chung, M. M. Abu-Khalaf, K. D. Miller, et al.
Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Before Preoperative Chemotherapy
Arch Surg, July 1, 2008; 143(7): 692 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Abrial, E. Thivat, O. Tacca, X. Durando, M.-A. Mouret-Reynier, P. Gimbergues, F. Penault-Llorca, and P. Chollet
Measurement of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2008; 26(18): 3094 - 3094.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. F. Symmans
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2008; 26(18): 3095 - 3095.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. S. Mehta and T. Schubbert
Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 7, 2008; 100(9): 680 - 680.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. J. Esteva and G. N. Hortobagyi
Can Early Response Assessment Guide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 16, 2008; 100(8): 521 - 523.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al.
Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 806 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. R. Gralow, H. J. Burstein, W. Wood, G. N. Hortobagyi, L. Gianni, G. von Minckwitz, A. U. Buzdar, I. E. Smith, W. F. Symmans, B. Singh, et al.
Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 814 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
M. J. C. Ellis
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 55 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online