Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 31 (November 1), 2007: pp. 4895-4901
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3471

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crehange, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bedenne, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crehange, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bedenne, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Trial of Protracted Compared With Split-Course Chemoradiation for Esophageal Carcinoma: Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9102

Gilles Crehange, Philippe Maingon, Karine Peignaux, Tan Dat N'guyen, Xavier Mirabel, Christian Marchal, Pierre Verrelle, Bernard Roullet, Franck Bonnetain, Laurent Bedenne

From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc; Department of Biostatistics, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive; Dijon University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Dijon; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand; and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France

Address reprint requests to Gilles Crehange, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre G-F Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21079 Dijon Cedex, France; e-mail: gcrehange{at}dijon.fnclcc.fr

Purpose Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an alternative to surgery for resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (RLA-EC). We investigated the heterogeneity of the treatment benefits across subgroups of patients, defined according to the radiation scheme.

Patients and Methods Between February 1993 and December 2000, 451 patients were enrolled. The following two schemes were allowed: protracted radiotherapy (P-RT), which scheduled 46 Gy over 4.5 weeks or split-course radiotherapy (SC-RT) with two 1-week courses of 15 Gy. Two courses of cisplatin and fluorouracil were delivered concomitantly. In case of exclusive CRT, a further course of 20 Gy over 2 weeks in the P-RT group and one 1-week course of 15 Gy in the SC-RT group were delivered with three courses of chemotherapy. SC-RT and P-RT were administered to 285 patients (64%) and 161 patients (36%), respectively.

Results For P-RT versus SC-RT, the response rate to induction CRT was 67% v 68%, respectively (P = .09), and 2-year local relapse-free survival rate was 76.7% v 56.8%, respectively (P = .002). Shorter tumor length and P-RT were associated with better local control in multivariate analysis (P = .002 for both). After a median follow-up time of 47.4 months, 2-year overall survival rate was 37.1% for P-RT compared with 30.5% for SC-RT (P = .25). Independent prognostic factors on survival were tumor diameter (P = .02), weight loss of 10% or less (P = .05), and response to induction CRT (P = .002).

Conclusion Patients with RLA-EC treated with P-RT had better local control than patients treated with SC-RT. Response to induction CRT is a determinant prognostic factor on survival.

Supported by grants from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, the Fonds de Recherche de la Société Nationale Française de Gastroentérologie, the Programme Hospitalier pour la Recherche Clinique, and the Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer.

Presented orally in part at the 25th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, October 8-12, 2006, Leipzig, Germany; the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, November 5-9, 2006, Philadelphia, PA; and the 31st Journées Francophones de Pathologie Digestive, March 17-21, 2007, Lyon, France.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S.-K. Tai, M.-H. Yang, L.-W. Wang, T.-L. Tsai, P.-Y. Chu, Y.-F. Wang, J.-L. Huang, and S.-Y. Chang
Chemoradiotherapy Laryngeal Preservation for Advanced Hypopharyngeal Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 11, 2008; (2008) hyn073v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online