This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wu, X. Articles by Spitz, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wu, X. Articles by Spitz, M. R. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Bladder Cancer Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Bladder Cancer in White Individuals

Xifeng Wu, Jie Lin, H. Barton Grossman, Maosheng Huang, Jian Gu, Carol J. Etzel, Christopher I. Amos, Colin P. Dinney, Margaret R. Spitz

From the Departments of Epidemiology and Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Address reprint requests to Xifeng Wu, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Hermann Pressler Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: xwu{at}mdanderson.org

Purpose There has been no risk assessment model for bladder cancer (BC). We developed the first model incorporating mutagen sensitivity and epidemiologic factors to predict BC risk.

Patients and Methods We used epidemiologic and genetic data from a large case-control study to build the models and constructed receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model discriminatory ability. We also projected absolute risk of developing BC by taking into account competing causes of death.

Results The study included 678 white BC patients and 678 controls. Significant risk factors in the epidemiologic model included pack-years smoked and exposures to diesel, aromatic amines, dry cleaning fluids, radioactive materials, and arsenic. This model yielded good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.73). When mutagen sensitivity data were incorporated, the AUC increased to 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.82). The models showed excellent concordance in the internal validation. We also computed an easy to use ordinal risk score and provided examples for projecting absolute risk.

Conclusion We have developed the first risk prediction model for BC. The enhanced model integrating the genetic factor exhibited excellent discriminatory ability. Our model only requires an individual to answer a few simple questions during a clinic visit to project individualized probability. This model may be used as a basis for developing a Web-based tool for BC risk assessment. Validation of our model in an external population is an essential next step towards practical use in the clinical setting.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA74880 and CA91846.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Stern, J. Lin, J. D. Figueroa, K. T. Kelsey, A. E. Kiltie, J.-M. Yuan, G. Matullo, T. Fletcher, S. Benhamou, J. A. Taylor, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA Repair Genes, Smoking, and Bladder Cancer Risk: Findings from the International Consortium of Bladder Cancer Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 69(17): 6857 - 6864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lin, A. Kamat, J. Gu, M. Chen, C. P. Dinney, M. R. Forman, and X. Wu Dietary Intake of Vegetables and Fruits and the Modification Effects of GSTM1 and NAT2 Genotypes on Bladder Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2009; 18(7): 2090 - 2097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Freedman, M. L. Slattery, R. Ballard-Barbash, G. Willis, B. J. Cann, D. Pee, M. H. Gail, and R. M. Pfeiffer Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Tool for White Men and Women Without Known Susceptibility J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2009; 27(5): 686 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]