Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141 on October 22 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 33 (November 20), 2007: pp. 5203-5209
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Increasing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients: A Trend Toward More Aggressive Surgical Treatment
Todd M. Tuttle,
Elizabeth B. Habermann,
Erin H. Grund,
Todd J. Morris,
Beth A. Virnig
From the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health; and the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
Address reprint requests to Todd M. Tuttle, MD, University of Minnesota, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN; e-mail: tuttl006{at}umn.edu
Purpose Many patients with unilateral breast cancer choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy to prevent cancer in the opposite breast. The purpose of our study was to determine the use and trends of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States.
Patients and Methods We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to review the treatment of patients with unilateral breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 through 2003. We determined the rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a proportion of all surgically treated patients and as a proportion of all mastectomies.
Results We identified 152,755 patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer; 4,969 patients chose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. The rate was 3.3% for all surgically treated patients; 7.7%, for patients undergoing mastectomy. The overall rate significantly increased from 1.8% in 1998 to 4.5% in 2003. Likewise, the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate for patients undergoing mastectomy significantly increased from 4.2% in 1998 to 11.0% in 2003. These increased rates applied to all cancer stages and continued to the end of our study period. Young patient age, non-Hispanic white race, lobular histology, and previous cancer diagnosis were associated with significantly higher rates. Large tumor size was associated with a higher overall rate, but with a lower rate for patients undergoing mastectomy.
Conclusion The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States more than doubled within the recent 6-year period of our study. Prospective studies are needed to understand the decision-making processes that have led to more aggressive breast cancer surgery.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on October 22, 2007.
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 16, 2007.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Correspondence
- Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Mind the Genetics
Evangelos Briasoulis and Dimitrios H. Roukos
JCO 2008 26: 1909-1910
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Solin
Breast Conservation Treatment With Radiation: An Ongoing Success Story
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2010;
28(5):
709 - 711.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zakhireh, B. Fowble, and L. J. Esserman
Application of Screening Principles to the Reconstructed Breast
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2010;
28(1):
173 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Garber and M. Golshan
Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The Story of the Other Side
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2009;
27(35):
5862 - 5864.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Mohiuddin and W. F. Regine
Consenting the Patient With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: "Informed" Only After Multi-Discliplinary Evaluation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2009;
27(30):
e158 - e159.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow, R. Jagsi, A. K. Alderman, J. J. Griggs, S. T. Hawley, A. S. Hamilton, J. J. Graff, and S. J. Katz
Surgeon Recommendations and Receipt of Mastectomy for Treatment of Breast Cancer
JAMA,
October 14, 2009;
302(14):
1551 - 1556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Katipamula, A. C. Degnim, T. Hoskin, J. C. Boughey, C. Loprinzi, C. S. Grant, K. R. Brandt, S. Pruthi, C. G. Chute, J. E. Olson, et al.
Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2009;
27(25):
4082 - 4088.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow and J. R. Harris
More Mastectomies: Is This What Patients Really Want?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2009;
27(25):
4038 - 4040.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Tuttle, S. Jarosek, E. B. Habermann, A. Arrington, A. Abraham, T. J. Morris, and B. A. Virnig
Increasing Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2009;
27(9):
1362 - 1367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Recht
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Caveat Emptor
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2009;
27(9):
1347 - 1349.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Roukos, E. Lykoudis, and T. Liakakos
Genomics and Challenges Toward Personalized Breast Cancer Local Control
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 10, 2008;
26(26):
4360 - 4361.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Briasoulis and D. H. Roukos
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Mind the Genetics
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2008;
26(11):
1909 - 1910.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Tuttle, E. B. Habermann, and B. A. Virnig
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2008;
26(11):
1910 - 1910.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
More Breast Cancer Patients Choosing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Journal Watch Women's Health,
December 6, 2007;
2007(1206):
2 - 2.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|