Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 34 (December 1), 2007: pp. 5359-5365
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9580

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shahinian, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shahinian, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, J. S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial

Characteristics of Urologists Predict the Use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Vahakn B. Shahinian, Yong-fang Kuo, Jean L. Freeman, Eduardo Orihuela, James S. Goodwin

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and the Department of Internal Medicine, the Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, the Department of Surgery Division of Urology, and the Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Address reprint requests to Vahakn B. Shahinian, MD, University of Michigan, 102 Observatory Rd, Simpson Memorial Institute Room 301, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0725; e-mail: vahakn{at}umich.edu

Purpose: We previously have reported wide variations among urologists in the use of androgen deprivation for prostate cancer. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked database, we examined how individual urologist characteristics influenced the use of androgen deprivation therapy.

Methods: Participants included 82,375 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 2002, and the 2,080 urologists who provided care to them. Multilevel analyses were used to estimate the likelihood of androgen deprivation use within 6 months of diagnosis in the overall cohort, in a subgroup in which use would be of uncertain benefit (primary therapy for localized prostate cancer), and in a subgroup in which use would be evidence-based (adjuvant therapy with radiation for locally advanced disease).

Results: In the overall cohort of patients, a multilevel model adjusted for patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and urologist characteristics (eg, board certification, academic affiliation, patient panel size, years since medical school graduation) showed that the likelihood of androgen deprivation use was significantly greater for patients who saw urologists without an academic affiliation. This pattern also was noted when the analysis was limited to settings in which androgen deprivation would have been of uncertain benefit. Odds ratios for use in that context were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.16) for urologists with no academic affiliation and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.85) for urologists with minor versus major academic affiliations.

Conclusion: Use of androgen deprivation for prostate cancer varies by the characteristics of the urologist. Patients of non–academically affiliated urologists were significantly more likely to receive primary androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer, a setting in which the benefits are uncertain.

Supported in part by Public Health Service Grants No. RO1CA116758, P50CA105631, and R24HS011618. The funding bodies had no role in data extraction and analyses, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

This study used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Related Editorial

  • Moving Beyond Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Care for Men With Prostate Cancer
    Christopher S. Saigal
    JCO 2007 25: 5348-5349 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Urologists' Patterns of Prescribing ADT for Prostate Cancer Patients
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, December 18, 2007; 2007(1218): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. S. Saigal
Moving Beyond Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Care for Men With Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5348 - 5349.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online