Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 4 (February 1), 2007: pp. 362-369
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1720

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pappo, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pappo, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, W. H.

Two Consecutive Phase II Window Trials of Irinotecan Alone or in Combination With Vincristine for the Treatment of Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: The Children's Oncology Group

Alberto S. Pappo, Elizabeth Lyden, Phillip Breitfeld, Sarah S. Donaldson, Eugene Wiener, David Parham, Kristine R. Crews, Peter Houghton, William H. Meyer

From the Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Preventive and Societal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR; St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Address reprint requests to Alberto S. Pappo, MD, Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin St, MC CC 1510.00, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: aspappo{at}txccc.org

Purpose: To estimate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan alone and in combination with vincristine when administered as window therapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma.

Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients younger than age 21 years with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma received window therapy with two cycles of irinotecan (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, repeated for 2 weeks) and 50 patients received window therapy with vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (weeks 0, 1, 3, and 4) and two cycles of irinotecan (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, repeated for 2 weeks). Patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) received these agents alternating with vincristine (V; 1.5/mg/m2), dactinomycin (A; 1.5 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (C; 2.2 g/m2) during weeks 6 through 41. Nonresponders were treated with VAC alone. Radiotherapy was administered to sites of disease at weeks 15 to 21.

Results: The window response rate (PR/CR) for patients who received irinotecan was 42% (95% CI, 38% to 80%) but the high progressive disease (PD) rate of 32% (95% CI, 11% to 52%) prompted closure of the trial. The window CR/PR rate for patients who received vincristine and irinotecan was 70% (95% CI, 57% to 83%), and the PD rate was only 8%. GI toxicities (abdominal pain, diarrhea, dehydration) were the most common adverse effects associated with the administration of irinotecan.

Conclusion: The combination of vincristine and irinotecan is highly active in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. The different mechanism of action and nonoverlapping toxicity profile with VAC makes this combination an attractive candidate for further testing in intermediate risk patients with rhabdomyosarcoma.

Supported by Grants No. U10 CA 98543, CA 13539, and CA 30969.

Presented in part in abstract form at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 13-17, 2005, Orlando, FL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
O. Oberlin, A. Rey, E. Lyden, G. Bisogno, M. C.G. Stevens, W. H. Meyer, M. Carli, and J. R. Anderson
Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcomas: Results of a Pooled Analysis From United States and European Cooperative Groups
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2008; 26(14): 2384 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
F. G. Barr and W. H. Meyer
Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Overview of Biology, Clinical Features, and the Current Children's Oncology Group Studies
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 465 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online