This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galvin, J. M. Articles by De Neve, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Galvin, J. M. Articles by De Neve, W. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Intensity Modulating and Other Radiation Therapy Devices for Dose Painting

James M. Galvin, Wilfried De Neve

From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Address reprint requests to James M. Galvin, DSc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bodine Center, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107; e-mail: james.galvin{at}mail.tju.edu

The introduction of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the early 1990s created the possibility of generating dramatically improved dose distributions that could be tailored to fit a complex geometric arrangement of targets that push against or even surround healthy critical structures. IMRT is a new treatment paradigm that goes beyond the capabilities of the earlier technology called three-dimensional radiation therapy (3DCRT). IMRT took the older approach of using fields that conformed to the silhouette of the target to deliver a relatively homogeneous intensity of radiation and separated the conformal fields into many subfields so that intensity could be varied to better control the final dose distribution. This technique makes it possible to generate radiation dose clouds that have indentations in their surface. Initially, this technology was mainly used to avoid and thus control the dose delivered to critical structures so that they are not seriously damaged in the process of irradiating nearby targets to an appropriately high dose. Avoidance of critical structures allowed homogeneous dose escalation that led to improved local control for small tumors. However, the normal tissue component of large tumors often prohibits homogeneous dose escalation. A newer concept of dose-painting IMRT is aimed at exploiting inhomogeneous dose distributions adapted to tumor heterogeneity. Tumor regions of increased radiation resistance receive escalated dose levels, whereas radiation-sensitive regions receive conventional or even de-escalated dose levels. Dose painting relies on biologic imaging such as positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. This review will describe the competing techologies for dose painting with an emphasis on their commonalities.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Dirix, V. Vandecaveye, F. De Keyzer, S. Stroobants, R. Hermans, and S. Nuyts Dose Painting in Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Value of Repeated Functional Imaging with 18F-FDG PET, 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET, Diffusion-Weighted MRI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1020 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Lawrence, N. J. Petrelli, B. D. Li, and J. M. Galvin Think Globally, Act Locally J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2007; 25(8): 921 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF]